Abrams v. Pneumo Abex Corp., 951 A.2d 255 (Pa. 2008). · Go Syfert
Search
Abrams v. Pneumo Abex Corp., 951 A.2d 255 (Pa. 2008). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
74 citation events (74 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Phantom Fireworks Showrooms, LLC v. Tom Wolf, Governor of the Comwlth of PA (pacommwct, 2018-12-04)
Treatment trajectory · 2008 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2008 2017 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Phantom Fireworks Showrooms, LLC v. Tom Wolf, Governor of the Comwlth of PA
Pa. Commw. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See id.
discussed Cited "see" Washington, Aplts. v. Dept. of Pub. Welfare
Pa. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See Christ the K/'ng Manor v. Commonwea/th, Dept. of Pub//`c We/fare, 911 A.2d 624 , 637 (Pa. melth. 2006) (holding “a violation of Article l||, Section 4 is dependent upon a violation of Article lll, Sections 1 or 3”), aff’d, 951 A.2d 255 (Pa. 2008); Marcavage v. Rende//, 888 A.2d 940, 947 (Pa. melth. 2005) (same); Common Cause/Pennsy/van/'a v. Commonwea/th, 710 A.2d 108, 121 (Pa. melth. 1998) (“ln light of our determination that the enactment of Act 3 did not violate either Article |ll, Section 1 or Article ll|, Section 3 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, we also conclude that the Ge…
discussed Cited "see" Washington, Aplts. v. Dept. of Pub. Welfare
Pa. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See Christ the King Manor v. Commonwealth, Dept. of Public Welfare, 911 A.2d 624 , 637 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2006) (holding "a violation of Article III, Section 4 is dependent upon a violation of Article III, Sections 1 or 3"), aff'd, 597 Pa. 217 , 951 A.2d 255 (2008) ; Marcavage v. Rendell, 888 A.2d 940 , 947 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2005) (same); Common Cause/Pennsylvania v. Commonwealth, 710 A.2d 108 , 121 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1998) ("In light of our determination that the enactment of Act 3 did not violate either Article III, Section 1 or Article III, Section 3 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, we also conclude that t…
discussed Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Neiman (2×)
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally id.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Daley v. A.W. Chesterton, Inc. (2×)
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Abrams v. Pneumo Abex Corp., 939 A.2d 388 (2007) (en banc), appeal granted in part, 597 Pa. 219 , 951 A.2d 255 (2008) as to the following issue: “Does prior recovery of damages for increased risk and fear of developing cancer due to asbestos exposure, awarded under the one-disease rule, preclude a plaintiff from recovering damages for cancer that developed and was diagnosed after tire separate disease rule was adopted in [ Marinari, supra]?" Id.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Eleanor ABRAMS, Executrix of the Estate of Kenneth Abrams, Petitioner
v.
PNEUMO ABEX CORP., Et Al., Respondents; Marilyn Shaw, Executrix of the Estate of John Shaw, Petitioner v. A.W. Chesterton, Inc., Et Al., Respondents
Petition 45 EAL 2008, 46 EAL 2008.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Jun 10, 2008.
951 A.2d 255
Per Curiam.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 10th day of June, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED as to the following issue, which has been rephrased for clarity:

(1) Does prior recovery of damages for increased risk and fear of developing cancer due to asbestos exposure, awarded under the one-disease rule, preclude a plaintiff from recovering damages for cancer that developed and was diagnosed after the separate disease rule was adopted in Marinari v. [*220] Asbestos Corporation, Ltd., 417 Pa.Super. 440, 612 A.2d 1021 (1992) (en banc)?