State v. Akande, 966 A.2d 237 (Conn. 2009). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Akande, 966 A.2d 237 (Conn. 2009). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“id the appellate court properly determine that the defendant waived his claim that the jury instructions were constitutionally deficient”
29 citation events (29 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Ebron (conn, 2009-07-28)
Treatment trajectory · 2009 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2009 2017 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
examined Cited as authority (quoted) State v. Ebron (2×)
Conn. · 2009 · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
id the appellate court properly determine that the defendant waived his claim that the jury instructions were constitutionally deficient
discussed Cited "see" State v. Richard W.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
Although we generally do not review claims that are inadequately briefed; see Stuart v. Stuart, 112 Conn. App. 160 , 165 n.2, 962 A.2d 842 , cert. granted on other grounds, 290 Conn. 920 , 966 A.2d 237 (2009); the statement of the claim itself provides an adequate basis on which to rule.
State of Connecticut
v.
Jason Shola Akande
SC 18325.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 5, 2009.
966 A.2d 237
Katherine C. Essington, special public defender, in support of the petition.
McLachlan.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published
1 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 62%
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Connecticut (2)

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 111 Conn. App. 596 (AC 27755), is granted, limited to the following issue:

[*919] Decided March 5, 2009 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18325. Katherine C. Essington, special public defender, in support of the petition.
“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the defendant waived his claim that the jury instructions were constitutionally deficient?”
VERTEFEUILLE and MCLACHLAN, Js.,

did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.