green
Positive treatment
6.7 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Batts, Q., Aplt.
See Commonwealth v. Batts, 766 EDA 2008, 12-16, 974 A.2d 1175 (Pa. Super.
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Batts
See Commonwealth v. Batts, 974 A.2d 1175 , -, No. 766 EDA 2008, slip op. at 12 (Pa.Super.2009) (table) (quoting Commonwealth v. Wilson, 911 A.2d 942, 946 (Pa.Super.2006), for the proposition that: “[T]he Roper decision bars only the imposition of the death penalty in cases involving juvenile offenders.
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Barnett
(2×)
See Commonwealth v. Barnett, 974 A.2d 1175 (Pa.Super.2009) (unpublished memorandum at 6-8). 14 Although offered the opportunity to bring a direct appeal on his weight, sufficiency and suppression of evidence claims, Barnett, for whatever reason, has not raised any of those arguments in this nunc pro tunc direct appeal. 15 As a result, Barnett technically does not seek “hybrid review” of direct and collateral claims.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
COM.
v.
BAKER.
v.
BAKER.
1791 EDA 2006.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
Mar 31, 2009.
Published
Affirmed.