HIMMELSTEIN v. Town of Windsor, 980 A.2d 910 (Conn. 2009). · Go Syfert
Search
HIMMELSTEIN v. Town of Windsor, 980 A.2d 910 (Conn. 2009). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
9 citation events (9 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Connery v. Gieske (conn, 2016-10-11)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Connery v. Gieske
Conn. · 2016 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Gates v. Gates , 51 Conn.Supp. 148 , 155, 975 A.2d 147 (2008) (plain and unambiguous language of § 45a-186 provides that limitations period for filing probate appeal commences with mailing of order or decree), aff'd, 115 Conn.App. 293 , 971 A.2d 852 , cert. denied, 293 Conn. 924 , 980 A.2d 910 (2009).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Paul R. Himmelstein
v.
Town of Windsor Et Al.
SC 18455.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 23, 2009.
980 A.2d 910
Juri E. Taalman, in support of the petition., Beatrice S. Jordan, in opposition.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 116 Conn. App. 28 (AC 29821), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the judgment as to the nuisance claim based on its determination that General Statutes § 13a-149 was the plaintiffs exclusive remedy when it also determined that the plaintiffs claim did not fall within § 13a-149?”