green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
9.5 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 2009 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2009
2017
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Carney v. Horion Investments Ltd.
although courts in equitable proceedings often look by analogy to the statute of limitations to determine whether, in the interests of justice, a particular action should be heard, they are by no means obliged to adhere to those time limitations.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Carney v. Lopez
although courts in equitable proceedings often look by analogy to the statute of limitations to determine whether, in the interests of justice, a particular action should be heard, they are by no means obliged to adhere to those time limitations.
discussed
Cited "see"
Antwon W. v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
See Smith v. Commissioner of Correction , 116 Conn.App. 383 , 389, 975 A.2d 751 , cert. denied, 293 Conn. 925 , 980 A.2d 912 (2009) ; Beverly v. Commissioner of Correction , 101 Conn.App. 248 , 252, 922 A.2d 178 , cert. denied, 283 Conn. 907 , 927 A.2d 916 (2007) ; Ziel v. Commissioner of Correction , 89 Conn.App. 371 , 378, 873 A.2d 239 , cert. denied, 275 Conn. 920 , 883 A.2d 1254 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Jah'za G.
(2×)
See Smith v. Commissioner of Correction, 116 Conn. App. 383, 391 , 975 A.2d 751 (“[T]he decision of a trial lawyer not to make an objection is a matter of trial tactics, not evidence of incompetency. . . . [T]here is a strong presumption that the trial strategy employed by [trial] counsel is reasonable and is a result of the exercise of professional judgment . . . .” [Internal quotation marks omitted.]), cert. denied, 293 Conn. 925 , 980 A.2d 912 (2009).
discussed
Cited "see"
Saunders v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
See Smith v. Commissioner of Correction, 116 Conn. App. 383, 391 , 975 A.2d 751 (“[T]he decision of a trial lawyer not to make an objection is a matter of trial tactics, not evidence of incompetency. . . . [TJhere is a strong presumption that the trial strategy employed by a criminal defendant’s counsel is reasonable and is a result of the exercise of professional judgment . . . .” [Internal quotation marks omitted.]), cert. denied, 293 Conn. 925 , 980 A.2d 912 (2009).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bozelko v. Papastavros
See, e.g., Rossman v. Morasco , 115 Conn.App. 234 , 243, 974 A.2d 1 , cert. denied, 293 Conn. 923 , 980 A.2d 912 (2009) ; see also T.
David Neal SMITH
v.
COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION.
v.
COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 23, 2009.
Published
Citer courts: D. Connecticut (2)
Frank C. Bartlett, Jr., special public defender, in support of the petition.
Leon F. Dalbec, Jr., senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
The petitioner David Neal Smith's petition for certification for appeal from the[*913] Appellate Court, 116 Conn.App. 383, 975 A.2d 751 (2009), is denied.