green
Positive treatment
3.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 2009 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2009
2017
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Blumberg Associates Worldwide, Inc. v. Brown & Brown of Connecticut, Inc.
See Keller v. Beckenstein, 117 Conn. App. 550, 564-65 , 979 A.2d 1055 (plaintiffs failed to allege claim for breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing where complaint did not set forth factual allegations of fraud, misrepresentation or improper motive on part of defendants), cert. denied, 294 Conn. 913 , 983 A.2d 274 (2009); Fidelity Bank v. Krenisky, 72 Conn. App. 700, 719-21 , 807 A.2d 968 (counterclaim for breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing legally insufficient where defendants failed to allege factual *100 allegations of bad faith), cert. denied, 262 …
cited
Cited "see"
State v. MARCELINO S.
See State v. King, 116 Conn. App. 372, 382-83 , 976 A.2d 765 , cert. denied, 294 Conn. 912 , 983 A.2d 274 (2009).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
LoRicco v. Hula's New Haven, LLC
Bad faith means more than mere negligence; it involves a dishonest purpose. . . . [B]ad faith may be overt or may consist of inaction, and it may include evasion of the spirit of the bargain . . . .” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Brennan Associates v. OBGYN Specialty Group, supra, 127 Conn. App. 759 -60; see also Keller v. Beckenstein, 117 Conn. App. 550, 563-64 , 979 A.2d 1055 , cert. denied, 294 Conn. 913 , 983 A.2d 274 (2009).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Oles J. Baptiste
v.
Oles J. Baptiste
SC 18497.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 17, 2009.
Annacarina Jacob, senior assistant public defender, in support of the petition., Lisa A. Riggione, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
McLachlan.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 114 Conn. App. 750 (AC 28718), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant waived any constitutional or plain error claim that the trial court’s jury instructions on the charge of assault of a police officer in violation of General Statutes § 53a-167c (a) deprived him of his right to a fair trial and his right to present a defense?”
McLACHLAN, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.