green
Positive treatment
3.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 2009 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2009
2017
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Blumberg Associates Worldwide, Inc. v. Brown & Brown of Connecticut, Inc.
See Keller v. Beckenstein, 117 Conn. App. 550, 564-65 , 979 A.2d 1055 (plaintiffs failed to allege claim for breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing where complaint did not set forth factual allegations of fraud, misrepresentation or improper motive on part of defendants), cert. denied, 294 Conn. 913 , 983 A.2d 274 (2009); Fidelity Bank v. Krenisky, 72 Conn. App. 700, 719-21 , 807 A.2d 968 (counterclaim for breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing legally insufficient where defendants failed to allege factual *100 allegations of bad faith), cert. denied, 262 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Reed
See, e.g., State v. Therrien , 117 Conn.App. 256 , 259-60, 978 A.2d 556 (defendant placed threatening calls to complainant's personal cellular telephone during work hours), cert. denied, 294 Conn. 913 , 983 A.2d 275 (2009) ; State v. Lemay , 105 Conn.App. 486 , 488-89, 938 A.2d 611 (defendant repeatedly, anonymously called complainant and made banging noises), cert. denied, 286 Conn. 915 , 945 A.2d 978 (2008) ; State v. Bell , 55 Conn.App. 475 , 477, 739 A.2d 714 (defendant placed forty-five phone calls), cert. denied, 252 Conn. 908 , 743 A.2d 619 (1999), overruled in part on other grounds by …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
LoRicco v. Hula's New Haven, LLC
Bad faith means more than mere negligence; it involves a dishonest purpose. . . . [B]ad faith may be overt or may consist of inaction, and it may include evasion of the spirit of the bargain . . . .” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Brennan Associates v. OBGYN Specialty Group, supra, 127 Conn. App. 759 -60; see also Keller v. Beckenstein, 117 Conn. App. 550, 563-64 , 979 A.2d 1055 , cert. denied, 294 Conn. 913 , 983 A.2d 274 (2009).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Moulton
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Therrien, 117 Conn. App. 256 , 978 A.2d 556 (initial conviction for harassment based on defendant’s threatening calls to victim’s personal cellular telephone), cert. denied, 294 Conn. 913 , 983 A.2d 275 (2009); State v. Lemay, 105 Conn. App. 486 , 938 A.2d 611 (affirming defendant’s conviction for harassment where he repeatedly, anonymously called victim and made banging noises), cert. denied, 286 Conn. 915 , 945 A.2d 978 (2008); State v. Bell, supra, 55 Conn. App. 475 ; State v. Marsala, 43 Conn. App. 527 , 684 A.2d 1199 (1996) (affirming defendant’s conviction for…
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Edith J. VARELA.
v.
Edith J. VARELA.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Dec 1, 2009.
Published
Neal Cone, senior assistant public defender, in support of the petition.
Rocco A. Chiarenza, special deputy assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 115 Conn.App. 531, 973 A.2d 156 (2009), is denied.