green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
13.3 score
“o be eligible for relief under the pcra, the petitioner must be currently serving a sentence of imprisonment, probation or parole for the crime.”
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010
2018
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Com. v. Priovolos, E.
o be eligible for relief under the pcra, the petitioner must be currently serving a sentence of imprisonment, probation or parole for the crime.
discussed
Cited "see"
In the Int. of: S.E., Appeal of: S.E.
Commonwealth v. Holmes, 14 A.3d 89, 95 (Pa. 2011); see Commonwealth v. Williams, 980 A.2d 667, 672 (Pa. Super. 2009) (citations omitted) (noting that “[r]easonable suspicion must be based on specific and articulable facts, and it must be assessed based upon the totality of circumstances viewed through the eyes of a trained police officer.”), appeal denied, 990 A.2d 730 (Pa. 2010).
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Reavis, A.
See Appellant’s Brief at 3. -3- J-A17021-19 Super. 2009) (assertion that trial court erroneously imposed illegal sentence is a question of law and, as such, Superior Court’s scope of review is plenary and its standard of review is de novo), appeal denied, 990 A.2d 730 (Pa. 2010).
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Shields, M.
Commonwealth v. Holmes, 14 A.3d 89, 95 (Pa. 2011); see Commonwealth v. Williams, 980 A.2d 667 , -7- J-S74022-18 672 (Pa. Super. 2009) (citations omitted) (noting that “[r]easonable suspicion must be based on specific and articulable facts, and it must be assessed based upon the totality of circumstances viewed through the eyes of a trained police officer.”), appeal denied, 990 A.2d 730 (Pa. 2010).
discussed
Cited "see"
General Refractories Co. v. First State Insurance
Co. v. Steely, 567 Pa. 98 , 785 A.2d 975, 978 (2001) (citing Madison Constr., 735 A.2d at 106 ); accord Kropa v. Gateway Ford, 974 A.2d 502, 508 (Pa.Super.Ct.2009), appeal denied, 605 Pa. 701 , 990 A.2d 730 (2010).
cited
Cited "see"
Com. v. D.L.W.
See -6- J-A17041-14 Commonwealth v. Williams, 977 A.2d 1174, 1176 (Pa. Super. 2009), appeal denied, 990 A.2d 730 (Pa. 2010).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Alexander
(2×)
See Commonwealth v. Williams, 980 A.2d 667, 672 (Pa.Super.2009), appeal denied, 605 Pa. 700 , 990 A.2d 730 (2010). [7] 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9754(b) (statutory provision permitting court to attach reasonable, specified conditions found in section 9754(c) to a probation order "as it deems necessary to insure or assist the defendant in leading a law-abiding life."). [8] 61 P.S. § 331.27b, which was repealed in October 2009, was in effect at the time that Alexander was sentenced on August 15, 2008.
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Wilson
(2×)
See Commonwealth v. Williams, 980 A.2d 667, 672 (Pa.Super.2009), appeal denied, 605 Pa. 700 , 990 A.2d 730 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Com. v. Stokes, M.
See also Commonwealth v. Williams, 977 A.2d 1174 (Pa.Super. 2009), appeal denied, 605 Pa. 700 , 990 A.2d 730 (2010) (explaining that once sentence is completed, petitioner is ineligible for PCRA relief). “[T]he statutory requirement that a PCRA petitioner be currently serving the sentence is applicable…where the PCRA court’s order was issued while petitioner was still serving the required sentence, but that sentence terminated prior to the resolution of his appeal.” Commonwealth v. Plunkett, 151 A.3d 1108, 1112-13 (Pa.Super. 2016), appeal denied, 641 Pa. 633 , 169 A.3d 524 (2017) (emph…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Com. v. McKenna, P.
See also Commonwealth v. Williams, 977 A.2d 1174 (Pa.Super. 2009), appeal denied, 605 Pa. 700 , 990 A.2d 730 (2010) (explaining that once sentence is completed, petitioner is ineligible for PCRA relief). “[T]he statutory requirement that a PCRA petitioner be currently serving the sentence is applicable…where the PCRA court’s order was issued while petitioner was still serving the required sentence, but that sentence terminated prior to the resolution of his appeal.” Commonwealth v. Plunkett, 151 A.3d 1108, 1112-13 (Pa.Super. 2016), appeal denied, 641 Pa. 633 , 169 A.3d 524 (2017). -2- …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Com. v. Davis, A.
See also Commonwealth v. Williams, 977 A.2d 1174 (Pa.Super. 2009), appeal denied, 605 Pa. 700 , 990 A.2d 730 (2010) (explaining that once sentence is completed, petitioner is ineligible for PCRA relief). “[T]he statutory requirement that a PCRA petitioner be currently serving the sentence is applicable…where the PCRA court’s order was issued while petitioner was still serving the required sentence, but that sentence terminated prior to the resolution of his appeal.” Commonwealth v. Plunkett, 151 A.3d 1108, 1112-13 (Pa.Super. 2016), appeal denied, 641 Pa. 633 , 169 A.3d 524 (2017).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Com. v. Salvaggi, M.
See also Commonwealth v. Williams, 977 A.2d 1174 (Pa.Super. 2009), appeal denied, 605 Pa. 700 , 990 A.2d 730 (2010) (explaining that once sentence is completed, petitioner is ineligible for PCRA relief).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Com. v. Stoner, C.
See also Commonwealth v. Williams, 977 A.2d 1174 (Pa.Super. 2009), appeal denied, 605 Pa. 700 , 990 A.2d 730 (2010) (explaining petitioner must be serving sentence of imprisonment, probation, or parole for crime at issue to be eligible for PCRA relief; as soon as sentence is completed, petitioner becomes ineligible for PCRA relief; PCRA precludes relief for those petitioners whose sentences have expired, regardless of collateral consequences of their sentences).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Com. v. Priovolos, E.
See e.g., Commonwealth v. Williams, 977 A.2d 1174 (Pa. Super. 2009), appeal denied, 990 A.2d 730 (Pa. 2010) (citation omitted) (explaining “[a]s soon as his sentence is completed, petitioner becomes ineligible for relief, regardless of whether he was serving his sentence when he filed the petition”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Com. v. Taylor, Q.
See also Commonwealth v. Williams, 977 A.2d 1174 (Pa.Super. 2009), appeal denied, 605 Pa. 700 , 990 A.2d 730 (2010) (explaining petitioner must be serving sentence of imprisonment, probation, or parole for crime at issue to be eligible for PCRA relief; once sentence is completed, petitioner is ineligible for PCRA relief, regardless of whether he was serving his sentence when he filed petition).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Com. v. Pacheco-Morales, D.
See also Commonwealth v. Williams, 977 A.2d 1174 -2- J-S70011-17 (Pa.Super. 2009), appeal denied, 605 Pa. 700 , 990 A.2d 730 (2010) (explaining petitioner must be serving sentence of imprisonment, probation, or parole for crime at issue to be eligible for PCRA relief; once sentence is completed, petitioner is ineligible for PCRA relief, regardless of whether he was serving his sentence when he filed petition).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Com. v. Escudero-Aviles, C.
See also Commonwealth v. Williams, 977 A.2d 1174 (Pa.Super. 2009), appeal denied, 605 Pa. 700 , 990 A.2d 730 (2010) (explaining petitioner must be serving sentence of imprisonment, probation, or parole for crime at issue to be eligible for PCRA relief; once sentence is completed, petitioner is ineligible for PCRA relief, regardless of whether he was serving his sentence when he filed petition).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Com. v. Berry, E.
See 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 6105(a)(1); see also Commonwealth v. Williams, 980 A.2d 667, 673-74 (Pa. Super. 2009) (concluding that carrying a firearms without a license and persons not to possess firearms do not merge for sentencing purposes), appeal denied, 990 A.2d 730 (Pa. 2010). -3- J-S24019-17 and REAP.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Com. v. Govens, M.
See also Commonwealth v. Williams, 980 A.2d 667, 672 (Pa. Super. 2009), appeal denied 990 A.2d 730 (Pa. 2010) (“The situation here is distinguishable in that the tip was made in person giving [the officer] an opportunity to observe the witness’ demeanor and assess his credibility in light of this past experience with investigating crimes.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Com. v. Butler, P.
See also Commonwealth v. Williams, 977 A.2d 1174 (Pa.Super. 2009), appeal denied, 605 Pa. 700 , 990 A.2d 730 (2010) (explaining petitioner must be serving sentence of imprisonment, probation, or parole for crime at issue to be eligible for PCRA relief; when sentence is completed, petitioner becomes ineligible for PCRA relief, regardless of whether he was serving his sentence when he filed petition).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Com. v. Sweeney, A.
See Brown, supra at 477-478 ; see also Commonwealth v. Williams, 980 A.2d 667, 671-672 (Pa. Super. 2009) (concluding that a tip made to a police officer in person where officer had “an opportunity to observe the witness’ demeanor and assess his credibility in light of his past experience with investigating crimes” affords the tip more weight than “a mere anonymous phone call[]”), appeal denied, 990 A.2d 730 (Pa. 2010); Ranson, supra at 78-79 (distinguishing cases where general and vague anonymous tips were deemed unconstitutional to support reasonable suspicion where veteran officer …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Com. v. Fullman, A.
See also Commonwealth v. Williams, 977 A.2d 1174 (Pa.Super. 2009), appeal denied, 605 Pa. 700 , 990 A.2d 730 (2010) (explaining petitioner must be serving sentence of imprisonment, probation, or parole for crime at issue to be eligible for PCRA relief; as soon as sentence is completed, petitioner becomes ineligible for PCRA relief; PCRA precludes relief for those petitioners whose sentences have expired, regardless of collateral consequences of their sentences).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
COM.
v.
WHETZEL.
v.
WHETZEL.
403 WAL (2009).
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Mar 9, 2010.
990 A.2d 730
Published
Citer courts: Superior Court of Pennsylvania (1)
Disposition of Petition for Allowance of Appeal Denied.