State v. Acosta, 991 A.2d 568 (Conn. 2010). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Acosta, 991 A.2d 568 (Conn. 2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
32 citation events (32 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Chemlen (connappct, 2016-05-31)
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010 2018 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
cited Cited "see" State v. Chemlen
Conn. App. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Dickman, 119 Conn.App. 581 , 588-89, 989 A.2d 613 , cert. denied, 295 Conn. 923 , 991 A.2d 569 (2010) ; part III A of this opinion.
cited Cited "see" State v. Inglis
Conn. App. Ct. · 2014 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord- ingly, it does not merit Golding review.’’ State v. Antwon W., 118 Conn. App. 180, 201 , 982 A.2d 1112 (2009), cert. denied, 295 Conn. 922 , 991 A.2d 568 (2010).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Fluker
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Antwon W., 118 Conn. App. 180, 191 , 982 A.2d 1112 (2009), cert. denied, 295 Conn. 922 , 991 A.2d 568 (2010); see also State v. Golding, supra, 213 Conn. 240 . *369 II Next, the defendant claims that the prosecutor committed prosecutorial impropriety by deliberately disregarding a court order regarding the admissibility of certain evidence involving police efforts to locate the defendant.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Thompson (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Dickman, 119 Conn. App. 581, 588 , 989 A.2d 613 , cert. denied, 295 Conn. 923 , 991 A.2d 569 (2010).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Myers (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Acosta, 119 Conn. App. 174, 185-86 , 988 A.2d 305 (venireperson arrested on drug charge dismissed from robbery trial), cert. denied, 295 Conn. 923 , 991 A.2d 568 (2010); State v. Sells, 112 Conn. App. 775, 786 , 964 A.2d 97 (venireperson convicted of failure to appear dismissed from burglary trial), cert. denied, 291 Conn. 908 , 969 A.2d 173 (2009).
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Noel ACOSTA, Jr.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Apr 7, 2010.
991 A.2d 568
Published

Norman A. Pattis, Bethany and K. Murray Smith, in support of the petition.

James A. Killen, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 119 Conn.App. 174, 988 A.2d 305 (2010), is denied.