green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
25.8 score
“this court has held that such procedural statutes (e.g. statutes that change a statute of limitations) operate retrospectively.”
Treatment trajectory · 2015 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2015
2020
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
examined
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Jones v. State
(8×)
also: Cited as authority (rule), Cited "see"
we have no doubt that cp 8-401 was passed in response to holmes and supplants that casej
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Gregory Smith v. Wakefield, LP
this court has held that such procedural statutes (e.g. statutes that change a statute of limitations) operate retrospectively.
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Tate v. State
(3×)
also: Cited "see"
Id. at 653, 117 A.3d at 1141 (cleaned up).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Rich
Id, at 653, 117 A.3d 1093 (alterations in original) (distinguishing State v. Daughtry, 419 Md. 35 , 18 A.3d 60 (2011)).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Sanmartin Prado
Coram Nobis Relief Recently, in State v. Smith, 443 Md. 572, 623-24 , 117 A.3d 1093, 1123-24 (2015) (per curiam), we described coram nobis relief as follows: Coram nobis is extraordinary relief designed to relieve a petitioner of substantial collateral consequences outside of a sentence of incarceration or probation where no other remedy exists. “[T]he writ of error coram nobis is an ancient common law device traditionally utilized to correct errors of fact.” Rivera v. State, 409 Md. 176, 189-90 , 973 A.2d 218, 227 (2009) (citation omitted).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hyman v. State
See Smith , 443 Md. at 606 , 117 A.3d 1093 ; North Carolina v. Alford , 400 U.S. 25 , 39, 91 S.Ct. 160 , 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970) (calling "prohibitions against involuntary or unintelligent pleas" "constitutional guarantees"); Padilla v. Kentucky , 559 U.S. 356 , 373-74, 130 S.Ct. 1473 , 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010) (recognizing that negotiation of a plea bargain and the duty to inform a client whether a plea carries a risk of deportation are part of the Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel).
cited
Cited "see"
Corey Woodfolk v. Gary Maynard
See State v. Smith, 443 Md. 572 , 117 A.3d 1093 , 1111 n.12 (2015). 9 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Paul R. Santamaria
A common threshold requirement to bringing a petition for a writ of coram nobis is that “sound reasons exist[ ] for failing] to seek appropriate earlier relief.” Morgan, 346 U.S. at 512 ; see State v. Smith, 117 A.3d 1093, 1108 (Md. 2015); State v. Hutton, 776 S.E.2d 621, 639 (W.
discussed
Cited "see"
Rich v. State
See Smith, 443 Md. at 619 , 117 A.3d 1093 (Barbera, C.J., concurring) (counting conspiracy as among those crimes *559 that are not readily understandable from the label of the crime itself); Daughtry, 419 Md. at 72 , 18 A.3d 60 (explaining that the complex nature of some crimes demands some additional explanation beyond simply pronouncing its name).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Duncan v. State
State v. Rich , 454 Md. 448 , 461, 164 A.3d 355 (2017), Skok v. State , 361 Md. 52 , 72-73, 760 A.2d 647 (2000) ; see also State v. Smith , 443 Md. 572 , 597, 117 A.3d 1093 (2015).
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND
v.
Walter H. KILLIAN
v.
Walter H. KILLIAN
Misc. Docket AG No. 03.
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Jul 10, 2015.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Maryland (1)
ORDER
Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-722, in which Respondent admits he committed professional misconduct in violation of Rule 1.15(d) and 8.4(d) of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct, and the record herein, it is this 10th day of July, 2015,
ORDERED, that Respondent, Walter H. Killian, be and he is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further
ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Walter H. Killian from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 16-772(d).