“e conclude that, for purposes of determining whether laches bars an individual's ability to seek coram nobis relief, prejudice involves not only the state's ability to defend against the coram nobis petition, but also the state's ability to reprosecute.”
Treatment trajectory · 2016 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2016
2021
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
examined
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Joshua M. Wren v. Reed Richardson
Wis. · 2019 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote
· confidence high
e conclude that, for purposes of determining whether laches bars an individual's ability to seek coram nobis relief, prejudice involves not only the state's ability to defend against the coram nobis petition, but also the state's ability to reprosecute.
examined
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Joshua M. Wren v. Reed Richardson
Wis. · 2019 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote
· confidence high
e conclude that, for purposes of determining whether laches bars an individual's ability to seek coram nobis relief, prejudice involves not only the state's ability to defend against the coram nobis petition, but also the state's ability to reprosecute.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Attorney Grievance v. Cassilly
Md. · 2021 · confidence medium
“The doctrine of laches, which is both an affirmative defense and an equitable defense, applies where there is an unreasonable delay in the assertion of one party’s rights and that delay results in prejudice to the opposing party.” Jones v. State, 445 Md. 324, 329 , 126 A.3d 1162, 1165 (2015) (citation omitted).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Attorney Grievance v. Cassilly
Md. · 2021 · confidence medium
“The doctrine of laches, which is both an affirmative defense and an equitable defense, applies where there is an unreasonable delay in the assertion of one party’s rights and that delay results in prejudice to the opposing party.” Jones v. State, 445 Md. 324, 329 , 126 A.3d 1162, 1165 (2015) (citation omitted).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Ademiluyi v. Md. State Bd. of Elections
Md. · 2018 · confidence medium
This Court has explained that "[t]he doctrine of laches, which is both an affirmative defense and an equitable defense, applies where there is an unreasonable delay in the assertion of one party's rights[,] and that delay results in prejudice to the opposing party." Jones , 445 Md. at 339 , 126 A.3d at 1171 (cleaned up).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Voters Organized for the Integrity of City Elections v. Baltimore City Elections Board
(2×)
Md. · 2017 · confidence medium
“The doctrine of laches, which is both an affirmative defense and an equitable defense, applies where there is an unreasonable delay in the assertion of one party’s rights and that delay results in prejudice to the opposing party.” Jones v. State, 445 Md. 324, 339 , 126 A.3d 1162, 1171 (2015) (citation, brackets, and internal quotation marks omitted).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rich v. State
Md. Ct. Spec. App. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jones, 445 Md. at 338 , 126 A.3d 1162 The circuit court did not address the question—it assumed, without deciding, that its “ruling.. .will have a collateral impact [on his] federal sentence,” then addressed the merits.