green
Positive treatment
Hot · 196 in 5y
Quoted verbatim 14×
136.0 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 2016 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2016
2021
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
Bay Harbor Marina Limited Partnership v. Erie County Board of Assessment Appeals and the School District of the City of Erie
Lebanon Valley, 83 A.3d at 112 ; but see Meyer, Darragh, Buckler, Bebenek & Eck, PLLC v. Law Firm of Malone Middleman, P.C., 635 Pa. 427 , 137 A.3d 1247 (2016).
examined
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
ROACH v. NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
it is well-established that three elements are necessary to plead a cause of action for breach of contract: (1) the existence of a contract, including its essential terms, (2) a breach of the contract; and, (3) resultant damages.
examined
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
ROACH v. NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
it is well-established that three elements are necessary to plead a cause of action for breach of contract: (1) the existence of a contract, including its essential terms, (2) a breach of the contract; and, (3) resultant damages.
examined
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
GRAHAM v. MOON LODGE CHIPS CORP.
it is well-established that three elements are necessary to plead a cause of action for breach of contract: (1) the existence of a contract, including its essential terms, (2) a breach of the contract; and, (3) resultant damages
examined
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
GORRIO v. CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SHORTER
it is well-established that three elements are necessary to plead a cause of action for breach of contract: (1) the existence of a contract, including its essential terms, (2) a breach of the contract; and, (3) resultant damages
examined
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
RCI HOSPITALITY HOLDINGS, INC. v. ASPEN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
it is well-established that three elements are necessary to plead a cause of action for breach of contract: (1) the existence of a contract, including its essential terms, (2) a breach of the contract; and, (3) resultant damages.
examined
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Aspen Specialty Insurance Company v. RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc.
it is well-established that three elements are necessary to plead a cause of action for breach of contract: (1) the existence of a contract, including its essential terms, (2) a breach of the contract; and, (3) resultant damages.
examined
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
THE LABORERS DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND v. MINISCALCO CORPORATION
it is well-established that three elements are necessary to plead a cause of action for breach of contract: (1) the existence of a contract, including its essential terms, (2) a breach of the contract; and (3) resultant damages.
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Mr. Bird's Custom Car Wash Equipment v. Ver-Tech Labs
(2×)
also: Cited as authority (rule)
t is axiomatic that a contract may be manifest orally, in writing, or as an inference from the acts and conduct of the parties.
examined
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
LEBOON v. DS WATERS OF AMERICA, INC.
hree elements are necessary to plead a cause of action for breach of contract: (1) the existence of a contract, including its essential terms, (2) a breach of the contract; and, (3) resultant damages.
examined
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
TRAHER v. REPUBLIC FIRST BANCORP, INC.
it is well-established that three elements are necessary to plead a cause of action for breach of contract: (1) the existence of a contract, including its essential terms, (2) a breach of the contract; and, (3) resultant damages.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Kramer, S. v. Nationwide Insurance, Aplt.
(6×)
also: Cited as authority (rule), Cited "see", Cited "see, e.g."
meyer darragh
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Kramer, S. v. Nationwide Insurance, Aplt.
(6×)
also: Cited as authority (rule), Cited "see", Cited "see, e.g."
meyer darragh
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
GORRIO v. TERRA
it is well-established that three elements are necessary to plead a cause of action for breach of contract: (1) the existence of a contract, including its essential terms, (2) a breach of the contract; and, (3) resultant damages
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
2019 E. Boston v. Viking Mill Assoc.
Associates, LP v. Spector Gadon & Rosen, P.C., 151 A.3d 646, 657 (Pa. Super. 2016) (quoting Meyer, Darragh, Buckler, Bebenek & Eck, P.L.L.C. v. Law Firm of Malone Middleman, P.C., 137 A.3d 1247, 1258 (Pa. 2016)).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Lori Mulder, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Maximus Services LLC and Maximus Federal Services, Inc., agent of Maximus, Inc. agent of BlackRock, Inc. agent of Fidelity Management & Research Co., LLC
Firm of Malone Middleman, P.C., 137 A.3d 1247, 1258 (Pa. 2016).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Iowa’s Window Experts LLC d/b/a The Window Source of Central Iowa v. The Window Source LLC
Doe v. Univ. of Scis., 961 F.3d 203, 211 (3d Cir. 2020) (quoting Meyer, Darragh, Buckler, Bebenek & Eck, P.L.L.C. v. Law Firm of Malone Middleman, P.C., 137 A.3d 1247, 1258 (Pa. 2016)).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Michalene Peticca v. The Roman Catholic Diocese of Harrisburg
(Doc. 31, p. 8 (noting that, in Braun, the employer conceded that its handbook promised specific benefits to employees, whereas the Diocese did not) (citing Braun, 24 A.3d at 944 ).) Therefore, it argues, no reasonable person could read the handbook or STD policy as expressing the Diocese’s intention to be “legally bound by the representations in its Employee Handbook.” (Id. at 10.) The elements of a breach of contract claim under Pennsylvania law are: “(1) the existence of a contract, including its essential terms; (2) a breach of the contract; and (3) the resultant damages.” Doe v.…
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
United States of America v. Dana M. Jackson
Pa. Aug. 22, 2024) (citing Meyer, Darragh, Buckler, Bebenek & Eck, P.L.L.C. v. Law Firm of Malone Middleman, P.C., 137 A.3d 1247, 1258 (Pa. 2016)).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Dennis Jackson, Lori Jackson v. Allstate Indemnity Company
Kelly v. Carman Corporation, 229 A.3d 634, 653 (Pa. Super. 2020) (citing Meyer, Darragh, Buckler, Bebenek & Eck, P.L.L.C. v. Law Firm of Malone Middleman, P.C., 137 A.3d 1247, 1258 (Pa. 2016)).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Poteat, A. v. Asteak, G.
An attorney who agrees for a fee to ____________________________________________ 13 “It is well-established that three elements are necessary to plead a cause of action for breach of contract: (1) the existence of a contract, including its essential terms, (2) breach of the contract; and (3) resultant damages.” Meyer, Darragh, Buckler, Bebenek & Eck, P.L.L.C. v. Law Firm of Malone Middleman, P.C., 137 A.3d 1247, 1258 (Pa. 2016)). - 27 - J-E04001-24 represent a client is by implication agreeing to provide that client with professional services consistent with those expected of the professio…
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
First Hartford Realty Corporation v. Food Ventures North America, Inc.
Firm of Malone Middleman, P.C., 137 A.3d 1247, 1258 (Pa. 2016). 85 See Mula Design, LLC D/B/A Mula Group v. Bestchoice Realty, Inc., 2025 WL 3090137 , at *5 (Pa. Super.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
National Liability & Fire Insurance Company v. Brimar Transit, Inc., Pittsburgh Public School District
Firm of Malone Middleman, P.C., 635 Pa. 427, 445 , 137 A.3d 1247, 1258 (Pa. 2016) (citing J.F.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
John Doe, Jane Doe, in their individual capacities, and as parents and natural guardians of James Doe, a minor v. The Haverford School
State law claims Three elements are required to establish a breach of contract under Pennsylvania law: “(1) the existence of a contract, including its essential terms, (2) a breach of the contract; and, (3) resultant damages.” Meyer et al. v. Law Firm of Mallone Middleman PC, 137 A.3d 1247, 1258 (Pa. 2016).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Global Maintenance, Inc. d/b/a Cenova, Inc. v. Tessera
More importantly, because, as Skookum explicitly recognizes in its trial brief, “it is axiomatic that a contract may be manifest orally, in writing, or as an inference from the acts and conduct of the parties,” Meyer, Darragh, Buckler, Bebenek & Eck, P.L.L.C. v. Law Firm of Malone Middleman, P.C., 137 A.3d 1247, 1258 (Pa. 2016), it cannot be the case that a document’s title has substantive legal import.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
SUPER COOL PRODUCTS, INC. v. BOEHRINGER LABORATORIES, LLC
Firm of Malone Middleman, P.C., 137 A.3d 1247, 1258 (Pa. 2016)). 71 Am.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
De Camara v. BRYN MAWR COLLEGE
We separately address why we dismiss the contract claims without needing to explain why the contract claims also are not shotgun pleadings. 117 ECF 17 at ¶¶ 147–66. 118 ECF 18-1 at 16–18; ECF 20 at 5–6. 119 ECF 19 at 22–23. 120 See Doe v. Univ. of Sciences, 961 F.3d 203, 211 (3d Cir. 2020) (quoting Meyer, Darragh, Buckler, Bebenek & Eck, P.L.L.C. v. Law Firm of Malone Middleman, P.C., 137 A.3d 1247, 1258 (Pa. 2016)). 121 See David v. Neumann Univ., 177 F. Supp. 3d 920, 925 (E.D.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
DOUGHERTY v. ESSENTIA INSURANCE COMPANY
Meyer, Darragh, Buckler, Bebenek & Eck, P.L.L.C. v. Law Firm of Malone Middleman, P.C., 137 A.3d 1247, 1258 (Pa. 2016).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
PNC Bank, National Association v. Viewpoint Global LLC
Firm of Malone Middleman, P.C., 137 A.3d 1247, 1258 (Pa. 2016) (Pennsylvania elements).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
The Chef's Warehouse Mid-Atlantic LLC v. Bayou Boys LLC
Pa. Aug. 22, 2024) (citing Meyer, Darragh, Buckler, Bebenek & Eck, P.L.L.C. v. Law Firm of Malone Middleman, P.C., 137 A.3d 1247, 1258 (Pa. 2016)).2 Here, The Chef’s Warehouse has 2 The complaint and motion for default judgment do not mention a choice of law provision.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
DIXIE v. KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Firm of Malone Middleman, P.C., 137 A.3d 1247, 1258 (Pa. 2016).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
ANDERSON v. TRAVELERS PERSONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Firm of Malone Middleman, P.C., 137 A.3d 1247, 1258 (Pa. 2016).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Lagarde Ltd. v. Federal Express Corporation
Firm of Malone Middleman, P.C., 137 A.3d 1247, 1258 (Pa. 2016). “‘Essential terms’ include, but are not limited to, the time or manner of performance of the contract and price or consideration.” Piccioli v. Faust Heating & A/C Co., No. 2532 EDA 2022, 2023 WL 3270881 , at *4 (Pa. Super.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Gorrio v. Briggs
Firm of Malone Middleman, P.C., 137 A.3d 1247, 1258 (Pa. 2016).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
STOVER v. NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY
Firm of Malone Middleman, P.C., 137 A.3d 1247, 1258 (Pa. 2016) (alteration to quote) (citation omitted).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Schuylkill Open MRI, Inc. v. Mammography Educators, Inc.
Firm of Malone Middleman, P.C., 137 A.3d 1247, 1258 (Pa. 2016).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
ANDREWS v. JPA R/E ASSOCIATES, L.P.
Firm of Malone Middleman, P.C., 137 A.3d 1247, 1258 (Pa. 2016)). 83 Compl. [Doc.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Keith Cauley v. Geisinger Clinic
Co., 311 F.3d 226, 233 (3d Cir. 2002) (quoting Childers v. Joseph, 842 F.2d 689, 694-95 (3d Cir. 1988)). 8 Under Pennsylvania law, to establish a claim for breach of contract, a plaintiff must demonstrate: “(1) the existence of a contract, including its essential terms; (2) a breach of the contract; and (3) resultant damages.” Doe v. Univ. of Scis., 961 F.3d 203, 211 (3d Cir. 2020) (brackets omitted) (quoting Meyer, Darragh, Buckler, Bebenek & Eck, P.L.L.C. v. Law Firm of Malone Middleman, P.C., 137 A.3d 1247, 1258 (Pa. 2016)).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Jeel Corp. v. Law Offices of Jonathan Wheeler
Firm of Malone Middleman, P.C., 137 A.3d 1247, 1258 (Pa. 2016).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
GLUNK v. THE UNITED STATES LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK
Firm of Malone Middleman, P.C., 137 A.3d 1247, 1258 (Pa. 2016)).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
DOE v. UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
Pa. 2021) (quoting Meyer, Darragh, Buckler, Bebenek & Eck, P.L.L.C. v. Law Firm of Malone Middleman, P.C., 137 A.3d 1247, 1258 (Pa. 2016)).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
FORD v. PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Firm of Malone Middleman, P.C., 137 A.3d 1247, 1258 (2016).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Signature Building Systems of Pennsylvania LLC and Signature Building Systems, Inc. v. Motorists Mutual Insurance Company
Firm of Malone Middleman, P.C., 137 A.3d 1247, 1258 (Pa. 2016)(citation omitted). quotation marks removed).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Kenneth Taggart v. PHH Mortgage Corp
Firm of Malone Middleman, P.C., 137 A.3d 1247, 1258 (Pa. 2016)) (cleaned up).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
JONES LANG LASALLE BROKERAGE, INC. v. LIBERTY 1100 VA DR LLC
Meyer, Darragh, Buckler, Bebenek & Eck, P.L.L.C. v. Law Firm of Malone Middleman, P.C., 137 A.3d 1247, 1258 (Pa. 2016).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Brothers Farming, LLC v. KEIM LUMBER COMPANY
Firm of Malone Middleman, P.C., 137 A.3d 1247, 1258 (Pa. 2016) (quoting Electron Energy Corp. v. Short, 597 A.2d 175, 177 (Pa. Super.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
C. Yedlosky & C. Taylor v. PSCOA
Meyer, Darragh, Buckler, Bebenek & Eck, P.L.L.C. v. Law Firm of Malone Middleman, P.C., 137 A.3d 1247, 1258 (Pa. 2016).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
FELDER v. CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCE
VI To succeed on her state-law claim for breach of contract, Felder must demonstrate “(1) the existence of a contract, including its essential terms, (2) a breach of the contract; and, (3) resultant damages.” Meyer, Darragh, Buckler, Bebenek & Eck, P.L.L.C. v. Law Firm of Malone Middleman, P.C., 137 A.3d 1247, 1258 (Pa. 2016).6 Felder alleges that Capital One breached the security agreement by “fail[ing] to 5 This regulation has been amended several times since it was first promulgated, in light of changes to generally accepted accounting principles, statutory amendments and regulatory r…
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
SIMS v. HARRY
Firm of Malone Middleman, P.C., 137 A.3d 1247, 1258 (Pa. 2016).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania
v.
Maurice McDONALD
v.
Maurice McDONALD
No. 33 EM 2016.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Apr 20, 2016.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.AND NOW, this 20th day of April, 2016, the Petition for Extraordinary Relief is DENIED.