Com. v. Perez, 14 A.3d 826 (Pa. 2011). · Go Syfert
Search
Com. v. Perez, 14 A.3d 826 (Pa. 2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
80 citation events (80 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Com. v. Peeples, H. (pasuperct, 2016-05-04)
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010 2018 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (rule) Com. v. Peeples, H. (3×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2016 · confidence medium
(See Peeples, supra at *1, *5-8 ; 3 n.3, supra).
discussed Cited "see" HEGGINS v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
W.D. Pa. · 2025 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Mollett, 5 A.3d 291 (Pa. Super. 2010), appeal denied, 14 A.3d 826 (2011) (stating jury is presumed to follow court’s instructions). [Petitioner]’s inability to show counsel’s alleged errors unduly prejudiced the outcome of his trial is most fatal to [Petitioner]’s claims of counsel’s ineffectiveness.
discussed Cited "see" Com. v. Murchison, D.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Padillas, 997 A.2d 356, 365 (Pa. Super. 2010), appeal denied, 14 A.3d 826 (Pa. 2010). -2- J-E02004-22 The PCRA court concluded that Appellant’s after-discovered evidence claim lacked merit since, in its view, recent DNA test results merely replicated the evidence placed before the jury at Appellant’s original trial and because the new evidence was not likely to compel a different result.
cited Cited "see" Com. v. Murchison, D.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2022 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Padillas, 997 A.2d 356, 365 (Pa. Super. 2010), appeal denied, 14 A.3d 826 (Pa. 2010).
cited Cited "see" Com. v. Spencer, J.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Mollett, 5 A.3d 291, 313 (Pa.Super. 2010), appeal denied, 609 Pa. 686 , 14 A.3d 826 (2011) (reiterating that juries are presumed to follow court’s instructions).
discussed Cited "see" Com. v. Nguyen, T.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Commonwealth v. Mollett, 5 A.3d 291, 308 (Pa. Super. 2010) (stating, “[a] witness who asserts his Fifth Amendment right is unavailable if the trial court finds that the witness’s concern with incriminating himself is valid[]”), appeal denied, 14 A.3d 826 (Pa. 2011).
discussed Cited "see" Com. v. Mbewe, C.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Padillas, 997 A.2d 356, 367 (Pa. Super. 2010), appeal denied, 14 A.3d 826 (Pa. 2010) (rejecting assertion that outcome would have been different based on defendant’s brother’s confession, noting close sibling relationship gave brother strong reason to fabricate confession exculpating defendant).
cited Cited "see" Com. v. Pappert, A.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Mollett, 5 A.3d 291 (Pa.Super. 2010), appeal denied, 14 A.3d 826 (Pa. 2011) (stating jury is presumed to follow court’s instructions).
cited Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Medina
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Padillas, 997 A.2d 356 (Pa.Super.2010), appeal denied, 609 Pa. 687 , 14 A.3d 826 (2010) (discussing due diligence element of newly discovered fact exception).
cited Cited "see" Leslie Mollett v. Leicth
3rd Cir. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See CP-02-CR-0000254-2006; see generally Commonwealth v. Mollett, 5 A.3d 291 (Pa.Super.Ct.2010), appeal denied, 609 Pa. 686 , 14 A.3d 826 (2011).
cited Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Bedford
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Mollett, 5 A.3d. 291 (Pa.Super.2010), appeal denied, 609 Pa. 686 , 14 A.3d 826 (2011) (stating jury is presumed to follow court’s instructions).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Com. v. White, R.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2020 · signal: see also · confidence low
Appellant and the Commonwealth timely filed supplemental briefs on August 4, 2020, and August 18, 2020, respectively. -6- J-S08004-20 Small, 189 A.3d at 972 ; see also Commonwealth v. Padillas, 997 A.2d 356, 363 (Pa. Super. 2010), appeal denied, 14 A.3d 826 (Pa. 2010).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
COM.
v.
PEREZ.
666 MAL (2010).
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Feb 3, 2011.
14 A.3d 826
Published

Disposition of Petition for Allowance of Appeal Denied.