State v. Sebben, 17 A.3d 1045 (Conn. 2011). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Sebben, 17 A.3d 1045 (Conn. 2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
15 citation events (15 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Walker v. Commissioner of Correction (connappct, 2025-01-14)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Walker v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2025 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sinchak v. Commissioner of Correction, 126 Conn. App. 670, 679 , 14 A.3d 348 (to show prejudice, petitioner was required to prove that, if motion for mistrial had been filed, it was reasonably probable that such motion would have been granted), cert. denied, 301 Conn. 901 , 17 A.3d 1045 (2011); see also Streater v. Commissioner of Correc- tion, 143 Conn. App. 88, 108 , 68 A.3d 155 (prejudice established by showing that court would have granted motion for mistrial), cert. denied, 310 Conn. 903 , 75 A.3d 34 (2013). ‘‘[Although] the remedy of a mistrial is permitted under the rules of pra…
cited Cited "see" State v. Sinchak
Conn. App. Ct. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sin- chak v. Commissioner of Correction, 126 Conn. App. 670, 681 , 14 A.3d 348 , cert. denied, 301 Conn. 901 , 17 A.3d 1045 (2011).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Sinchak
Conn. App. Ct. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
Although the defendant appealed from the judgment of the habeas court to the Appellate Court, which rejected his claims; see Sinchak v. Commissioner of Correction, 126 Conn. App. 670, 671 , 14 A.3d 348 , cert. denied, 301 Conn. 901 , 17 A.3d 1045 (2011); he did not challenge the habeas court’s decision with respect to his claim concerning the excessiveness of his sentence. 7 Practice Book § 43-22 provides: ‘‘The judicial authority may at any time correct an illegal sentence or other illegal disposition, or it may correct a sentence imposed in an illegal manner or any other disposition m…
cited Cited "see" State v. Sebben
Conn. App. Ct. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Sebben, 301 Conn. 904 , 17 A.3d 1045 (2011).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
PETER SEBBEN
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Apr 27, 2011.
17 A.3d 1045
John R. Williams, in support of the petition., Michael Proto, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Consideration, Eveleigh, Harper.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 32974) is denied.

EVELEIGH and HARPER, Js., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.