Mirjavadi v. Vakilzadeh, 23 A.3d 724 (Conn. 2011). · Go Syfert
Search
Mirjavadi v. Vakilzadeh, 23 A.3d 724 (Conn. 2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
28 citation events (28 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Schneider v. Schneider (connappct, 2015-11-03) · Strongest negative: State v. Artis (connappct, 2012-07-10)
Treatment trajectory · 2011 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2011 2018 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "but see" State v. Artis (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2012 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see State v. Mitchell, 127 Conn. App. 526, 531, 537 , 16 A.3d 730 (despite unnecessarily suggestive one-on-one show-up at crime scene, victim’s identification was reliable), cert. denied, 301 Conn. 929 , 23 A.3d 724 (2011); State v. Sanchez, supra, 128 Conn. App. 10 -11 (even though victim described assailant as “young” but defendant was forty-two years old and identification occurred sixteen months after crime, victim’s identification was rehable).
discussed Cited "see" Schneider v. Schneider (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Culver v. Culver, 127 Conn. App. 236, 242 , 17 A.3d 1048 , cert. denied, 301 Conn. 929 , 23 A.3d 724 (2011) (‘‘general rule is that a court order must be followed until it has been modified or successfully challenged’’ [internal quotation marks omitted]).
discussed Cited "see" Bank of New York v. Bell
Conn. App. Ct. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tanzman v. Meurer, 128 Conn. App. 405 , 407 n.2, 16 A.3d 1265 , cert. granted on other grounds, 301 Conn. 930 , 23 A.3d 724 (2011); Follacchio v. Follacchio, 124 Conn. App. 371 , 373 n.2, 4 A.3d 1251 , cert. granted on other grounds, 299 Conn. 914 , 10 A.3d 530 (2010).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Gutierrez (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low
It further weighed a possible discrepancy in Mogrovejo’s testimony about whether he ever lost sight of the defendant and explicitly found that it did not significantly detract from the reliability of the identification. “[T]he trial court is the sole arbiter of witness credibility . . . .” Blum v. Blum, supra, 109 Conn. App. 329 ; see also State v. Mitchell, 127 Conn. App. 526, 533 , 16 A.3d 730 (admission of identifications is factbound determination trial courts better equipped than appellate courts to make), cert. denied, 301 Conn. 929 , 23 A. 3d 724 (2011).
Leyla Mirjavadi Et Al.
v.
Anthony Vakilzadeh Et Al.
SC 18813.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 30, 2011.
23 A.3d 724
Lloyd D. Pedersen, in support of the petition., Brenden P. Leydon, in opposition.
Rogers.
Published

The defendant Maria Varone’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 128 Conn. App. 61 (AC 30608), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that several of the facts found by the trial court were clearly erroneous, and, therefore, the judgment in favor of the defendant must be reversed?”
[*930] Decided June 30, 2011 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18813. Lloyd D. Pedersen, in support of the petition. Brenden P. Leydon, in opposition. ROGERS, C. J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.