Marches v. Bd. of Selectman of Town of Lyme, 31 A.3d 1178 (Conn. 2011). · Go Syfert
Search
Marches v. Bd. of Selectman of Town of Lyme, 31 A.3d 1178 (Conn. 2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
30 citation events (30 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Casiraghi v. Casiraghi (connappct, 2020-10-13)
Treatment trajectory · 2011 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2011 2018 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Casiraghi v. Casiraghi
Conn. App. Ct. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See McKeon v. Lennon, 131 Conn. App. 585, 607 , 27 A.3d 436 , cert. denied, 303 Conn. 901 , 31 A.3d 1178 (2011). 3 Both parties were represented by counsel at the time of the dissolution judgment and throughout the postjudgment proceedings that underlie this appeal.
discussed Cited "see" Freeman v. A Better Way Wholesale Autos, Inc.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See McKeon v. Lennon , 131 Conn.App. 585 , 610-11, 27 A.3d 436 (dismissing portion of appeal challenging award of attorney's fees where trial court had not determined specific amount of attorney's fees prior to filing appeal), cert. denied, 303 Conn. 901 , 31 A.3d 1178 (2011) ; Sullivan v. Brown , 116 Conn.App. 660 , 661-63, 975 A.2d 1289 (dismissing, sua sponte, appeal challenging award of statutory attorney's fees and costs where trial court had not determined precise amount of attorney's fees and costs prior to defendants' filing appeal), cert. denied, 294 Conn. 914 , 983 A.2d 852 (2009).
examined Cited "see" Lederle v. Spivey (3×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See McKeon v. Lennon, 131 Conn. App. 585, 612 , 27 A.3d 436 , cert. denied, 303 Conn. 901 , 31 A.3d 1178 (2011). ‘‘A finding of fact is clearly erroneous when there is no evidence in the record to support it . . . or when although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Id.
discussed Cited "see" Tyler v. Tyler
Conn. App. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See McKeon v. Lennon, 131 Conn. App. 585, 611 , 27 A.3d 436 (dismiss- ing appeal of order for attorney’s fees for lack of final judgment because amount of attorney’s fees had not been conclusively determined at time appeal filed), cert. denied, 303 Conn. 901 , 31 A.3d 1178 (2011).
cited Cited "see" Martocchio v. Savoir
Conn. App. Ct. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See Martoc- chio v. Savoir, 130 Conn. App. 626, 629 , 23 A.3d 1282 , cert. denied, 303 Conn. 901 , 31 A.3d 1178 (2011).
discussed Cited "see" Clark v. Clark
Conn. App. Ct. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See McKeon v. Lennon, 131 Conn. App. 585, 611 , 27 A.3d 436 (appeal from order awarding attor- ney’s fees dismissed for lack of final judgment because, at time appeal was filed, amount of those fees had not been conclusively determined), cert. denied, 303 Conn. 901 , 31 A.3d 1178 (2011); Sullivan v. Brown, 116 Conn. App. 660, 663 , 975 A.2d 1289 (same), cert. denied, 294 Conn. 914 , 983 A.2d 852 (2009).
discussed Cited "see" Oldani v. Oldani
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See McKeon v. Lennon, 131 Conn. App. 585 , 595 n.2, 27 A.3d 436 , cert. denied, 303 Conn. 901 , 31 A.3d 1178 (2011). 5 The enforceability of prenuptial agreements executed prior to October 1, 1995, is governed by common-law principles and “the seminal, three- *615 prong test” set forth in McHugh v. McHugh, 181 Conn. 482, 485-86 , 436 A.2d 8 (1980).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Luongo Construction & Development, LLC v. MacFarlane
Conn. App. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Bridgeport Harbour Place I, LLC v. Ganim, 131 Conn. App. 99 , 144–45, 30 A.3d 703 , cert. granted, 303 Conn. 904, 905 , 31 A.3d 1178 , 1180 (2011) (appeals withdrawn January 26 and 27, 2012). 4 On July 27, 2015, the court awarded MacFarlane $47,359 in attorney’s fees.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Aliano v. Aliano
Conn. App. Ct. · 2014 · signal: see also · confidence low
Second, if we conclude that the underlying court order was sufficiently clear and unambiguous, we must then determine whether the trial court abused its discretion in issuing, or refusing to issue, a judgment of contempt, which includes a review of the trial court’s determination of whether the violation was wilful or excused by a good faith dispute or misunderstanding.” (Citations omitted.) In re Leah S., 284 Conn. 685, 693-94 , 935 A.2d 1021 (2007); Przekopski v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 131 Conn. App. 178, 191 , 26 A.3d 657 , cert. denied, 302 Conn. 946 , 30 A.3d 1 (2011); Lynn v. Lynn,…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rhonda M. Marchesi
v.
Board of Selectmen of the Town of Lyme Et Al.
SC 18890.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 17, 2011.
31 A.3d 1178
Kenneth M. McKeever, town attorney, in support of the petition., Harry B. Heller, in opposition.
Rogers, Harper.
Published

The petition by the defendants board of selectmen of the town of Lyme and the town of Lyme for certifica[*904] tion for appeal from the Appellate Court, 131 Conn. App. 24 (AC 29999), is granted, limited to the following issue:

Decided November 17, 2011 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18890. Kenneth M. McKeever, town attorney, in support of the petition. Harry B. Heller, in opposition.
“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court correctly determined that the parties were entitled to a trial de novo in the Superior Court from an appeal taken from the board of selectmen of the town of Lyme pursuant to General Statutes § 13a-40?”
ROGERS, C. J., and HARPER, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.