green
Positive treatment
5.5 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. KOMISARJEVSKY
(2×)
When reviewing a trial court's exercise of the legal discretion vested in it, our review is limited to whether the trial court correctly applied the law and reasonably could have concluded as it did." (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Vargas v. Doe, 96 Conn.App. 399, 408-409 , 900 A.2d 525 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 923 , 908 A.2d 546 (2006); accord Bank of New York v. Bell, 120 Conn.App. 837, 848 , 993 A.2d 1022 , cert. dismissed, 298 Conn. 917 , 4 A.3d 1225 (2010); Preston v. O'Rourke, 74 Conn.App. 301, 317 , 811 A.2d 753 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gould v. Commissioner of Correction
See Ankerman v. Commissioner of Correction, 122 Conn. App. 246, 252 , 999 A.2d 789 (petitioner’s claim that state failed to prove element of specific intent “is essentially one of sufficiency of the evidence and not one of actual innocence”), cert. denied, 298 Conn. 922 , 4 A.3d 1225 (2010); People v. Barnslater, 373 Ill.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
EASTERN SAVINGS BANK, FSB
v.
THOMAS CHARLES
v.
THOMAS CHARLES
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 22, 2010.
Thomas Charles, pro se, in support of the petition., Robert J. Piscitelli, in opposition.
Published
The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 32161) is denied.
Thomas Charles, pro se, in support of the petition. Robert J. Piscitelli, in opposition. Decided September 22, 2010