Commonwealth v. Staton, 58 A.3d 1243 (Pa. 2012). · Go Syfert
Search
Commonwealth v. Staton, 58 A.3d 1243 (Pa. 2012). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
37 citation events (37 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Com. v. Nicholson, M., Jr. (pasuperct, 2021-12-29)
Treatment trajectory · 2013 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2013 2019 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Com. v. Nicholson, M., Jr.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2021 · confidence medium
However, ____________________________________________ has been entered of record and accepted by the trial court, the state is required to abide by the terms of the plea agreement.” Commonwealth v. Mebane, 58 A.3d 1243, 1246 (Pa. Super. 2012) (citation omitted); see also Commonwealth v. Parsons, 969 A.2d 1259, 1268 (Pa. Super. 2009) (“Assuming the plea agreement is legally possible to fulfill, when the parties enter the plea agreement on the record, and the court accepts and approves the plea, then the parties and the court must abide by the terms of the agreement.”).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Com. v. Perry, K.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2021 · confidence medium
Commonwealth v. Mebane, 58 A.3d 1243, 1249 (Pa. Super. 2012).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Com. v. Baynes, D.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2019 · confidence medium
Commonwealth v. Mebane, 58 A.3d 1243, 1249 (Pa. Super. 2012).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Com. v. Wright, D.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2018 · confidence medium
Mebane, 58 A.3d at 1249 (finding that Commonwealth “vulpinely used . . . information regarding the [t]rial [c]ourt’s ruling prior to its disclosure to defense counsel,” leading defendant to proceed under belief he had entered into plea agreement with Commonwealth.”) (citation and quotation omitted).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Com. v. Brown, T.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2017 · confidence medium
Commonwealth v. Mebane, 58 A.3d 1243, 1249 (Pa. Super. 2012). [D]isputes over any particular term of a plea agreement must be resolved by objective standards.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Com. v. Saldana, E.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2016 · confidence medium
Commonwealth v. Mebane, 58 A.3d 1243, 1249 (Pa. Super. 2012). [D]isputes over any particular term of a plea agreement must be resolved by objective standards.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Shower, W. (2×)
Pa. · 2016 · confidence medium
The court then reiterated that “[sjpecific enforcement of valid plea bargains is a matter of fundamental fairness.” Id. (citing Commonwealth v. Mebane, 58 A.3d 1243, 1249 (Pa. Super. 2012)).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Grace, A.
Pa. · 2016 · confidence medium
The court then reiterated that “[s]pecific enforcement of valid plea bargains is a matter of fundamental fairness.” Id. (citing Commonwealth v. Mebane, 58 A.3d 1243, 1249 (Pa. Super. 2012)).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Martinez, G.
Pa. · 2016 · confidence medium
The court then reiterated that “[s]pecific enforcement of valid plea bargains is a matter of fundamental fairness.” Id. (citing Commonwealth v. Mebane, 58 A.3d 1243, 1249 (Pa. Super. 2012)).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Com. v. Nemeth, D.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2016 · confidence medium
Commonwealth v. Mebane, 58 A.3d 1243, 1249 (Pa. Super. 2012). [D]isputes over any particular term of a plea agreement must be resolved by objective standards.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Com. v. Williams, D.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2015 · confidence medium
“Where a plea agreement has been entered of record and accepted by the trial court, the state is required to abide by the terms of the plea agreement.” Commonwealth v. Mebane, 58 A.3d 1243, 1246 (Pa. Super. 2012), citing Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257 (1971).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Commonwealth v. Postie
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2015 · confidence medium
Commonwealth v. Mebane, 58 A.3d 1243, 1246 (Pa.Super.2012) (quoting Mabry v. Johnson, 467 U.S. 504 , 104 S.Ct. 2543 , 81 L.Ed.2d 437 (1984), disapproved on other grounds, Puckett v. U.S., 556 U.S. 129 , 129 S.Ct. 1423 , 173 L.Ed.2d 266 (2009); Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257 , 92 S.Ct. 495 , 30 L.Ed.2d 427 (1971)).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Commonwealth v. Hainesworth
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2013 · confidence medium
Commonwealth v. Mebane, 58 A.3d 1243, 1249 (Pa.Super.2012).
examined Cited "see" Com. v. Adams, R. (3×)
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2022 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Mebane, 58 A.3d 1243 (Pa. Super. 2012).
discussed Cited "see" Com. v. Smith, D. (2×)
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2022 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Mebane, 58 A.3d 1243 (Pa. Super. 2012).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Commonwealth v. Cosby, Jr., W., Aplt.
Pa. · 2021 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Scotland, at 614 F.2d at 365 (stating that, if “the defendant detrimentally relies on the government’s promise, the resulting harm from this induced reliance implicates due process guarantees”); see also Commonwealth v. Mebane, 58 A.3d 1243 (Pa. Super. 2012) (upholding trial court ruling that fundamental 28 See Khan v. State Bd. of Auctioneer Exam'rs, 842 A.2d 936, 946 (Pa. 2004) (“Substantive due process is the esoteric concept interwoven within our judicial framework to guarantee fundamental fairness and substantial justice . . . .”) (cleaned up). [J-100-2020] - 72 fairness req…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania
v.
Andre STATON
No. 178 EM 2012.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Nov 20, 2012.
58 A.3d 1243
Published

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 20th day of November, 2012, the Application for Leave to File Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED.