Coelm v. Imperato, 581 A.2d 1054 (Conn. 1990). · Go Syfert
Search
Coelm v. Imperato, 581 A.2d 1054 (Conn. 1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“an award will not be vacated on the ground that the construction placed on the facts or the interpretation of the agreement by the arbitrator was erroneous.”
38 citation events (15 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Granger Sons v. Envirotest Sys., No. Cv 98-0584269s (May 19, 1999) (connsuperct, 1999-05-19)
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Granger Sons v. Envirotest Sys., No. Cv 98-0584269s (May 19, 1999)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1999 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
an award will not be vacated on the ground that the construction placed on the facts or the interpretation of the agreement by the arbitrator was erroneous.
discussed Cited "see" In re Probate Appeal of Tunick
Conn. App. Ct. · 2022 · signal: see · confidence high
See Murphy’s Appeal from Probate, 22 Conn. App. 490 , 496–97, 578 A.2d 661 (in affirming Superior Court’s judgment dismissing plaintiff’s probate appeals, which challenged orders concerning adminis- tration of estate, as moot following distribution of estate’s property and approval of final accounting, agreeing with Superior Court’s conclusion that sepa- rate, pending probate appeal taken by plaintiff from approval of final accounting ‘‘sufficiently protect[ed]’’ plaintiff’s rights), cert. denied, 216 Conn. 823 , 581 A.2d 1057 (1990).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Simpson
Conn. App. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
The claim is adequately briefed before this court and, although it is not necessary to a determination that the claim is reviewable on appeal; see State v. Safford , 22 Conn.App. 531 , 534, 578 A.2d 152 , cert. denied, 216 Conn. 823 , 581 A.2d 1057 (1990) ; the record reflects that the defendant requested an evidentiary hearing related to his motion.
cited Cited "see" State v. Salas
Conn. App. Ct. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally State v. Safford, 22 Conn. App. 531, 534 , 578 A.2d 152 , cert. denied, 216 Conn. 823 , 581 A.2d 1057 (1990).
discussed Cited "see" Bartels v. Bartels (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bonelli v. Bonelli, 22 Conn. App. 248, 252 , 576 A.2d 587 , cert. denied, 216 Conn. 819 , 581 A.2d 1054 (1990).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Johnson
Conn. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Safford., 22 Conn. App. 531, 534 , 578 A.2d 152 , cert. denied, 216 Conn. 823 , 581 A.2d 1057 (1990) (motion to withdraw guilty plea and briefing of issue preserved claim despite failure to request hearing); see also State v. Watson, supra, 198 Conn. 612 -13 (defendant’s claim reviewed despite failure to request evidentiary hearing at any time); State v. Peterson, 51 Conn. App. 645, 648-49 , 725 A.2d 333 (1999) (defendant’s claim reviewed despite failure to request hearing at time of motion).
discussed Cited "see" Federal Deposit Insurance v. Keating (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Coelm v. Imperato, 23 Conn. App. 146, 150 , 579 A.2d 573 , cert. denied, 216 Conn. 823 , 581 A.2d 1054 (1990).
cited Cited "see" State v. Teel
Conn. App. Ct. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Safford, 22 Conn. App. 531, 537 , 578 A.2d 152 , cert. denied, 216 Conn. 823 , 581 A.2d 1057 (1990).
discussed Cited "see" Central Bank v. Colonial Romanelli Associates (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Coelm v. Imperato, 23 Conn. App. 146, 150 , 579 A.2d 573 , cert. denied, 216 Conn. 823 , 581 A.2d 1054 (1990).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Vredenburgh v. Norwalk Probate Court
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see also · confidence low
When, during the pendency of an appeal, events have occurred that preclude an appellate court from granting any practical relief through its disposition of the merits, a case has become moot.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Schiavone v. Snyder, 73 Conn. App. 712, 716 , 812 A.2d 26 (2002); see also Murphy’s Appeal from Probate, 22 Conn. App. 490, 494 , 578 A.2d 661 , cert. denied, 216 Conn. 823 , 581 A.2d 1057 (1990).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Stanley's Appeal from Probate
Conn. App. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Murphy’s Appeal from Probate, 22 Conn. App. 490 , 578 A.2d 661 (approval of final accounting, order of distribution rendered moot appeal from two orders involving administration of estate), cert. denied, 216 Conn. 823 , 581 A.2d 1057 (1990). 3 Furthermore, a court will not decide questions when there exists no actual controversy or when no actual practical relief can follow from the court’s determination.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." White v. Kampner
Conn. App. Ct. · 1993 · signal: see also · confidence low
Co. v. DelGreco, 205 Conn. 178, 187 , 530 A.2d 171 (1987); see also East Hartford v. East Hartford Municipal Employees Union, Inc., supra. “An award will not be vacated on the ground that the construction placed on the facts or the interpretation of the agreement by the arbitrator was erroneous.” Cashman v. Sullivan & Donegan, P.C., 23 Conn. App. 24, 27 , 578 A.2d 167 , cert. denied, 216 Conn. 821 , 581 A.2d 1054 (1990).
Coelm
v.
Frank Imperato
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 4, 1990.
581 A.2d 1054
Frank B. Velardi, Jr., in support of the petition., Joshua A. Winnick, in opposition.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 65%
Citer courts: Connecticut Superior Court (1)

The defendent’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 23 Conn. App. 146, is denied.