Lynch v. Granby Holdings, Inc., 635 A.2d 1230 (Conn. 1993).

Lynch v. Granby Holdings, Inc., 635 A.2d 1230 (Conn. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite

neutral Cited (no substantive treatment) 0.4 score

10 citation events across 2 distinct courts.

Treatment classes

Mentioned in passing 10

Treatment by court

connappct		0R/0Y/0G	7
conn		0R/0Y/0G	3

Joseph L. Lynch
v.
Granby Holdings, Inc. Granby Holdings, Inc. v. Daniel L. Lynch

SC 14868.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Dec 3, 1993.

635 A.2d 1230

228 Conn. 913

1993 Conn. LEXIS 422

Google Scholar ↗ | CourtListener ↗

Andrea A. Hewitt, in support of the petition., Timothy Brignole, in opposition.

Cited by 1 opinion | Published

The petition of Granby Holdings, Inc., for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 32 Conn. App. 574 (AC 11222), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Whether the Appellate Court was correct under the circumstance of this case in holding that a jury finding for the plaintiff Daniel Lynch, together with an award of zero damages, was required to be set aside and remanded for a new trial?”