green
Positive treatment
2.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Lopez
The trial court made no findings relative to the first two factors; see State v. Reis, 33 Conn. App. 521, 530 , 636 A.2d 872 , cert. denied, 229 Conn. 901 , 640 A.2d 118 (1994); and there was no motion for articulation.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Crosby
See State v. Graham, 33 Conn. App. 432, 442 , 636 A.2d 852 , cert. denied, 229 Conn. 906 , 640 A.2d 117 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Boyle
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Graham, 33 Conn.App. 432, 446-48 , 636 A.2d 852 (conditions of probation requiring defendant convicted of narcotics offense and larceny to provide for proper care and cleaning of home and prohibiting children younger than age thirteen being left alone without adult not reasonably related to the purposes of probation), cert. denied, 229 Conn. 906 , 640 A.2d 117 (1994).
Samuel Packtor
v.
Seppala and AHO Construction Company, Inc.
v.
Seppala and AHO Construction Company, Inc.
SC 14914.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 23, 1994.
David A. Leff, in support of the petition., Rene G. Martineau, in opposition.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 33 Conn. App. 422 (AC 12089/12090), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“In the circumstances of this case, did the plaintiff state a cause of action under General Statutes §§ 29-389 and 29-391 even though he was not injured while attempting to escape a building during a fire or other similar emergency?”