green
Positive treatment
1.4 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Arceniega
See, e.g., State v. Rivera, 52 Conn. App. 503, 512 , 728 A.2d 518 (no allegation of brutal, shocking conduct on part of defendant in alleged involvement in four armed robberies), cert. denied, 249 Conn. 906 , 733 A.2d 226 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Brandon W.
See, e.g., State v. Goodman, 35 Conn. App. 438, 442 , 646 A.2d 849 , cert. denied, 231 Conn. 940 , 653 A.2d 824 (1994); State v. Sawyer, 29 Conn. App. 68, 72 , 614 A.2d 471 (1992), rev’d on other grounds, 227 Conn. 566 , 630 A.2d 1064 (1994); Pettengill v. Pettengill, 18 Conn. App. 557, 559 , 559 A.2d 240 , cert. denied, 212 Conn. 808 , 563 A.2d 1356 (1989); see also Center Shops of East Granby, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning Commission, 52 Conn. App. 763, 780 , 727 A.2d 807 , cert. granted on other grounds, 249 Conn. 906 , 733 A.2d 223 (1999).
CENTER SHOPS OF EAST GRANBY, INC.
v.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF EAST GRANBY
v.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF EAST GRANBY
SC 16110.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 19, 1999.
Donald R. Holtman, in support of the petition., John W. Bradley, Jr., in opposition.
Palmer.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 52 Conn. App. 763 (AC 17875), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Whether the Appellate Court properly affirmed the decision of the trial court that applications for special permits are deemed automatically approved upon the failure of a planning and zoning commission effectively to act thereon within the time periods specified by law?”
PALMER, J.,did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.