Bender v. Bender, 763 A.2d 1037 (Conn. 2000). · Go Syfert
Search
Bender v. Bender, 763 A.2d 1037 (Conn. 2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Tevolini v. Tevolini (connappct, 2001-10-02)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" Tevolini v. Tevolini
Conn. App. Ct. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
In determining whether the trial court could reasonably conclude as it did on the evidence before it, every reasonable presumption should be given in favor of the correctness of its action.” (Emphasis added; internal quotation marks omitted.) Lowe v. Lowe, 47 Conn. App. 354, 361 , 704 A.2d 236 (1997); see Bender v. Bender, 60 Conn. App. 252, 256 , 758 A.2d 890 , cert. granted on other grounds, 255 Conn. 914 , 763 A.2d 1037 (2000).
cited Cited "see" Johnson v. De Toledo
Conn. App. Ct. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Dana Investment Corp. v. Schlesinger, 60 Conn. App. 76, 77 , 759 A.2d 99 , cert. denied, 255 Conn. 914 , 763 A.2d 1037 (2000).
SHARON BENDER
v.
MARK BENDER
SC 16434.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Dec 5, 2000.
763 A.2d 1037
Barry T. Pontolillo, in support of the petition., Joseph R. Galotti, Jr., in opposition.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 60 Conn. App. 252 (AC 18968), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court’s award of the defendant’s nonvested pension benefit was not impermissibly speculative?”

SULLIVAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.