Trimel v. Lawrence & Mem'l Hosp. Rehab. Ctr., 769 A.2d 64 (Conn. 2001). · Go Syfert
Search
Trimel v. Lawrence & Mem'l Hosp. Rehab. Ctr., 769 A.2d 64 (Conn. 2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
56 citation events (56 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Martinez v. Zovich (connappct, 2005-03-08)
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Martinez v. Zovich
Conn. App. Ct. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Statewide Grievance Committee v. Egbarin, 61 Conn. App. 445, 454 , 767 A.2d 732 , cert, denied, 255 Conn. 949 , 769 A.2d 64 (2001).
cited Cited "see" State v. Kirk R.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Price, 61 Conn. App. 417, 423-25 , 767 A.2d 107 , cert. denied, 255 Conn. 947 , 769 A.2d 64 (2001).
cited Cited "see" State v. Rivera
Conn. App. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Price, 61 Conn. App. 417, 420-21 , 767 A.2d 107 , cert. denied, 255 Conn. 947 , 769 A.2d 64 (2001).
cited Cited "see" Statewide Grievance Comm. v. Gifford, No. Cv 00-0800490 S (Jan. 23, 2002)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Statewide Grievance Committee v. Egbarin, 61 Conn. App. 445 , 453 , 767 A.2d 732 , cert. denied, 255 Conn. 949 , 769 A.2d 64 (2001).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Oliphant
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see also · confidence low
To establish an abuse of discretion, it must be shown that restrictions imposed on cross-examination were clearly prejudicial.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Lewis, 25 Conn. App. 354, 360 , 594 A.2d 489 , cert. denied, 220 Conn. 914 , 597 A.2d 336 (1991); see also State v. Price, 61 Conn. App. 417, 429 , 767 A.2d 107 , cert. denied, 255 Conn. 947 , 769 A.2d 64 (2001); State v. Oliver, 41 Conn. App. 139, 145 , 674 A.2d 1359 , cert. denied, 237 Conn. 920 , 676 A.2d 1374 (1996).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
GLORIA TRIMEL
v.
LAWRENCE AND MEMORIAL HOSPITAL REHABILITATION CENTER
SC 16493.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 15, 2001.
769 A.2d 64
Thomas J. Airone and William F. Gallagher, in support of the petition., Michael E. Driscoll and Jeffrey F. Buebendorf in opposition.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 61 Conn. App. 353 (AC 19675), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the trial court, in holding that all the plaintiffs claims sounded in medical malpractice rather than in ordinary negligence, usurp the function of a jury by deciding a question of fact in a summary judgment motion?”