Salmeri v. Dep't of Pub. Saf., 806 A.2d 1055 (Conn. 2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Salmeri v. Dep't of Pub. Saf., 806 A.2d 1055 (Conn. 2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
69 citation events (69 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Calderon-Perez (connappct, 2025-08-05)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Calderon-Perez
Conn. App. Ct. · 2025 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Morgan, 70 Conn. App. 255, 265 , 797 A.2d 616 (‘‘[a] defendant’s right to present a defense guarantees his or her right, to be exercised within limits, to present relevant evidence’’ (emphasis in original)), cert. denied, 261 Conn. 919 , 806 A.2d 1056 (2002).
discussed Cited "see" Dees v. Dees (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
Conn. App. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See id.
discussed Cited "see" Cornfield Point Ass'n v. Town of Old Saybrook
Conn. App. Ct. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
Jur. 2d 225, Deeds § 227 (2002); see Mackie v. Hull, 69 Conn. App. 538, 541 , 795 A.2d 1280 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 916 , 917, 806 A.2d 1055 (2002) (“[i]n construing a deed, a court must consider the language and terms of the instrument as a whole” [internal quotation marks omitted]).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Saucier
Conn. App. Ct. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
Here, although the court disallowed a question in a legitimate field of inquiry; see State v. Morgan, 70 Conn. App. 255, 274 , 797 A.2d 616 (“questions asked of a witness regarding whether he or she has cheated on his or her income taxes may be permissible to demonstrate alack of veracity”), cert. denied, 261 Conn. 919 , 806 A.2d 1056 (2002); that field of inquiry already was covered adequately by questions that the court had allowed.
cited Cited "see" Collard and Roe, PC v. Klein
Conn. App. Ct. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Morgan, 70 Conn. App. 255, 264 , 797 A.2d 616 (court’s right, duty to exclude irrelevant evidence), cert, denied, 261 Conn. 919 , 806 A.2d 1056 (2002).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Gebhardt
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Morgan, 70 Conn. App. 255, 262 , 797 A.2d 616 (noting that although defendant had preserved evidentiary claim, he did not preserve claim that he was deprived of constitutional right to present defense), cert. denied, 261 Conn. 919 , 806 A.2d 1056 (2002).
cited Cited "see" State v. Hilton
Conn. App. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Morgan, 70 Conn. App. 255, 289 , 797 A.2d 616 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 919 , 806 A.2d 1056 (2002).
cited Cited "see" Otwell v. Bulduc
Conn. App. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Morgan, 70 Conn. App. 255, 271-72 , 797 A.2d 616 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 919 , 806 A.2d 1056 (2002).
cited Cited "see" State v. Padua
Conn. App. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Morgan, 70 Conn. App. 255, 281 , 797 A.2d 616 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 919 , 806 A.2d 1056 (2002).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Rivera
Conn. App. Ct. · 2019 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Morgan , 70 Conn. App. 255 , 274, 797 A.2d 616 (trial court free to determine that remoteness of specific acts of misconduct tended to outweigh probative value), cert. denied, 261 Conn. 919 , 806 A.2d 1056 (2002).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Mourning
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Morgan, 70 Conn. App. 255, 281 , 797 A.2d 616 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 919 , 806 A.2d 1056 (2002). 3 Upon objection by the defendant during the court’s charge to the jury, the court clarified that the crime that the defendant and Daniels intended to commit was murder.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Northrop
Conn. App. Ct. · 2005 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Morgan, 70 Conn. App. 255, 281 , 797 A.2d 616 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 919 , 806 A.2d 1056 (2002). 4 Insofar as the defendant challenges the conviction for carrying a pistol without a permit, he stipulated at trial that he had not been issued a firearm permit.
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Coleman
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Morgan, 70 Conn. App. 255, 289-90 , 797 A.2d 616 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 919 , 806 A.2d 1056 (2002).
JOSEPH SALMERI
v.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 5, 2002.
806 A.2d 1055
Michelle J. Truglia, assistant attorney general, in support of the petition., Julie D. Blake and Jeffrey L. Ment, in opposition.
Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 70 Conn. App. 321 (AC 21106), is denied.

SULLIVAN, C. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.