State v. Moore, 909 A.2d 962 (Conn. 2006). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Moore, 909 A.2d 962 (Conn. 2006). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
10 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Smart v. Corbitt (connappct, 2011-03-01)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" Smart v. Corbitt
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See McVerry v. Charash, 96 Conn. App. 589, 598-600 , 901 A.2d 69 (preclusion of expert “tantamount to dismissing the plaintiffs case” but not disproportionate sanction when good cause for delay lacking and disclosure made thirteen weeks before trial), cert. denied, 280 Conn. 934 , 909 A.2d 961 (2006).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. James E.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see also · confidence low
The risk of death element of the statute focuses on the conduct of the defendant, not on the resulting injury to the victim.’’14 (Citation omitted; inter- nal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Holmes, 90 Conn. App. 544, 547 , 877 A.2d 826 , cert. denied, 275 Conn. 927 , 883 A.2d 1250 (2005); see also State v. Pearson, 97 Conn. App. 414, 421 , 904 A.2d 1259 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 934 , 909 A.2d 963 (2006). ‘‘A person acts recklessly with respect to a particular result or a circumstance described by a statute when he is aware of and consciously disregards a substantial and unjustifia…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
DAMEISHA MOORE
SC 17751.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 31, 2006.
909 A.2d 962
Proloy K. Das, assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition., Todd A. Bussert, special public defender, in opposition.
Published

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 97 Conn. App. 243 (AC 25696), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that there was insufficient evidence to support the defendant’s conviction of failure to appear in the second degree?”