green
Positive treatment
2.0 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Edmonds
See, e.g., State v. Kimble, 106 Conn. App. 572 , 594–95, 942 A.2d 527 (occupants of parked vehicle not seized when, at night, uniformed police offi- cer exited marked cruiser, approached vehicle, and questioned them), cert. denied, 287 Conn. 912 , 950 A.2d 1289 (2008); see also Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491 , 497–98, 103 S. Ct. 1319 , 75 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Houghtaling
Moskowitz, who observed the van and made the radio transmission, testified that ‘‘[w]e believed at that point in time [that the driver] was part of the investigation.’’ First, the court did not err in considering the defen- dant’s entering onto the property while the police were investigating the large marijuana grow operation as a factor contributing to reasonable suspicion. ‘‘The nature of the crime under investigation, the degree of suspicion, the location of the stop, the time of day, the reaction of the suspect to the approach of police are all facts which bear on the issue …
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
CHRISTOPHER CAROLINA
v.
CHRISTOPHER CAROLINA
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 21, 2008.
Carlos E. Caudal, special public defender, in support of the petition., Mitchell S. Brody, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 106 Conn. App. 139 (AC 27205), is denied.
[*913] Decided May 21, 2008 Carlos E. Caudal, special public defender, in support of the petition. Mitchell S. Brody, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.