State v. Fleming, 962 A.2d 794 (Conn. 2009). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Fleming, 962 A.2d 794 (Conn. 2009). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
27 citation events (27 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Melendez v. Deleo (connappct, 2015-08-25)
Treatment trajectory · 2009 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2009 2017 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" Melendez v. Deleo
Conn. App. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Fleming, 111 Conn. App. 337, 345 , 958 A.2d 1271 (2008) (‘‘[i]t is axiomatic that evidentiary inconsis- tencies are for the jury to resolve’’ [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 290 Conn. 903 , 962 A.2d 794 (2009); Hughes v. Lamay, 89 Conn. App. 378, 384 , 873 A.2d 1055 , (‘‘[t]he existence of conflicting evidence . . . curtails the authority of the court to overturn the verdict because the jury is entrusted with deciding which evidence is more credible and what effect it is to be given’’ [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 275 Conn. 9…
cited Cited "see" State v. Collins
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Fleming, 111 Conn. App. 337, 345 , 958 A.2d 1271 (2008), cert. denied, 290 Conn. 903 , 962 A.2d 794 (2009).
discussed Cited "see" Flaherty v. Flaherty
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the matter for an evidentiary hearing to determine the plaintiffs responsibilities pursuant to § 4.6 of the separation agreement. 3 In determining those responsibilities, we note that (1) the court may look to parol evidence to explain the ambiguity in the separation agreement; see *274 Ziotas v. Reardon Law Firm, P.C., 111 Conn. App. 287, 294 , 959 A.2d 1013 (2008), cert. granted on other grounds, 290 Conn. 903 , 962 A.2d 796 (2009); and (2) the plaintiff cannot be held in contempt for failure to comply with the separation ag…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Covington
Conn. App. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see also · confidence low
In cases in which a violation of § 29-35 is charged, "the length of the barrel is ... an element of [the] crime and must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt." State v. Hamilton , 30 Conn. App. 68 , 73, 618 A.2d 1372 (1993), aff'd, 228 Conn. 234 , 636 A.2d 760 (1994) ; see also State v. Fleming , 111 Conn. App. 337 , 346-47, 958 A.2d 1271 (2008), cert. denied, 290 Conn. 903 , 962 A.2d 794 (2009).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Robinson
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Fleming, 111 Conn. App. 337, 347-48 , 958 A.2d 1271 (2008) (evidence sufficient to prove firearm had less than twelve inch barrel despite weapon not having been introduced into evidence), cert, denied, 290 Conn. 903 , 962 A.2d 794 (2009). c The defendant’s final argument concerning the sufficiency of the evidence pertains to several inconsistencies in the testimony of the three eyewitnesses.
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Randy FLEMING.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 7, 2009.
962 A.2d 794
Published

William B. Westcott, special public defender, in support of the petition.

Ronald G. Weller, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 111 Conn.App. 337, 958 A.2d 1271 (2008), is denied.