green
Positive treatment
10.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 2009 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2009
2017
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Gonzalez
(2×)
See State v. Jones, 115 Conn. App. 581 , 597–600, 974 A.2d 72 (holding that it was not improper for prosecutor to argue that defen- dant’s DNA was contained in DNA mixture found in victim when evidence was presented at trial that defen- dant was included as contributor to mixture), cert. denied, 293 Conn. 916 , 979 A.2d 492 (2009); see also State v. Brett B., 186 Conn. App. 563, 584 , 200 A.3d 706 (2018), cert. denied, 330 Conn. 961 , 199 A.3d 560 (2019).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Brett B.
(2×)
See State v. Jones , 115 Conn. App. 581 , 597-600, 974 A.2d 72 , cert. denied, 293 Conn. 916 , 979 A.2d 492 (2009).
cited
Cited "see"
Estela v. Bristol Hospital, Inc.
See Beckenstein Enterprises-Prestige Park, LLC v. Keller , 115 Conn. App. 680 , 690-91, 974 A.2d 764 , cert. denied, 293 Conn. 916 , 979 A.2d 488 (2009) ; see also footnote 3 of this opinion.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Faust
See State v. Palangio, 115 Conn. App. 355, 362 , 973 A.2d 110 , cert. denied, 293 Conn. 919 , 979 A.2d 492 (2009).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Flores
See State v. Palangio, 115 Conn. App. 355, 368-69 , 973 A.2d 110 (rejecting claim that jury instruction identical in all material respects to instruction given in present case misled jury as to intent required to find defendant guilty of conspiracy charge), cert. denied, 293 Conn. 919 , 979 A.2d 492 (2009); see also State v. McGee, supra, 124 Conn. App. 269 -71 (rejecting claim that instruction tracking language of § 53a-48 [a] misled jury as to specific intent requirement of conspiracy); State v. Morales, 84 Conn. App. 283, 297-98, 300-301 , 853 A.2d 532 (same), cert. denied, 271 Conn. 928 ,…
discussed
Cited "see"
Motzer v. Haberli
See Beckenstein Enterprises-Prestige Park, LLC v. Keller, 115 Conn. App. 680, 691 , 974 A.2d 764 (“[this court has] never found an abuse of discretion in denying an amendment on the eve of trial, long after the conclusion of pretrial proceedings” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert, denied, 293 Conn. 916 , 979 A.2d 488 (2009).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Thoma v. Watson
Realty, Inc., 145 Conn. App. 696, 711 , 77 A.3d 165 (2013), aff’d, 315 Conn. 596 , 109 A.3d 473 (2015); see also Beckenstein Enterprises-Prestige Park, LLC v. Keller, 115 Conn. App. 680 , 689–90, 974 A.2d 764 , cert. denied, 293 Conn. 916 , 979 A.2d 488 (2009).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sokolovsky v. Mulholland
Moreover, our Supreme Court expressly has held that matters in avoidance of a statute of limitations ‘‘need not be pleaded in the complaint.’’ Ross Realty Corp. v. Surkis, 163 Conn. 388, 392 , 311 A.2d 74 (1972) (‘‘[i]t has been and is the holding of this court that matters in avoidance of the [s]tatute of [l]imitations need not be pleaded in the complaint but only in response to such a defense properly raised’’); see also, e.g., Beckenstein Enter- prises-Prestige Park, LLC v. Keller, 115 Conn. App. 680, 691 , 974 A.2d 764 (‘‘we conclude that the court properly denied the p…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Wayne JONES.
v.
Wayne JONES.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 17, 2009.
Published
Stephanie L. Evans, special public defender, in support of the petition.
Frederick W. Fawcett, special assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 115 Conn.App. 581, 974 A.2d 72 (2009), is denied.