green
Positive treatment
3.5 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Tomick v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
See State v. Gaskin, 116 Conn. App. 739, 744 , 977 A.2d 681 , cert. denied, 294 Conn. 914 , 983 A.2d 851 (2009).
cited
Cited "see"
Hirschfeld v. Machinist
See Sullivan v. Brown, 116 Conn. App. 660, 662-63 , 975 A.2d 1289 , cert. denied, 294 Conn. 914 , 983 A.2d 852 (2009).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bailey v. Lanou
A finding as to liability only, prior to a determination on the issue of damages, is not a final judgment from which an appeal lies.” Relying on that precedent, this court has held that when “[i]t is undisputed . . . that the plaintiff filed her [appeal] before the amount of attorney’s fees had been conclusively determined,” the portion of the appeal pertaining to the award of attorney’s fees “was not taken from a final judgment.” McKeon v. Lennon, 131 Conn. App. 585, 611 , 27 A.3d 436 , cert. denied, 303 Conn. 901 , 31 A.3d 1178 (2011); see also Sullivan v. Brown, 116 Conn. App.…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Darron L. GASKIN.
v.
Darron L. GASKIN.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Dec 1, 2009.
Published
James B. Streeto, assistant public defender, in support of the petition.
Robert J. Scheinblum, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 116[*852] Conn.App. 739, 977 A.2d 681 (2009), is denied.