green
Positive treatment
2.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Dean v. Coughlin
See Chapman v. Rhodes, 434 F.Supp. 1007, 1016 (S.D.Ohio 1977), aff'd, 624 F.2d 1099 (6th Cir.1980), rev. in other part, 452 U.S. 337, 344 , 101 S.Ct. 2392, 2398 , 69 L.Ed.2d 59 (1981) (failure of dental clinic to formulate individual treatment plans for dental patients is not unconstitutional).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rhodes v. Chapman
(2×)
See 624 F. 2d 1099 (1980). [11] In Hutto v. Finney, 437 U. S. 678 (1978), the state prison administrators did not dispute the District Court's conclusion that the conditions in two Arkansas prisons constituted cruel and unusual punishment.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lareau v. Manson
See, e. g., Chapman v. Rhodes, 624 F.2d 1099 (6th Cir. 1980), aff’g without published opinion 434 F.Supp. 1007 (S.D.Ohio 1977) (declaring unconstitutional the double-celling of convicted prisoners); Campbell v. Cauthron, 623 F.2d 503, 506-07 (8th Cir. 1980) (holding that overcrowding, including placing of inmates in multiple-bunk cells, violated due process rights of pretrial detainees and Eighth Amendment rights of convicted prisoners); Adams v. Mathis, 614 F.2d 42, 43 (5th Cir. 1980) (per curiam), aff’g 458 F.Supp. 302 (M.D.Ala.1978) (Johnson, J.) (holding that conditions, including over…
Holley
v.
Anderson
v.
Anderson
79-1708.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Jun 16, 1980.
624 F.2d 1099
Published
Holley
v.
Anderson
79-1708
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Sixth Circuit
6/16/80
1
E.D.Mich.
AFFIRMED