United States v. Lopez-Llerena, 721 F.2d 311 (11th Cir. 1983). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Lopez-Llerena, 721 F.2d 311 (11th Cir. 1983). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
11 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Roberto Mieres-Borges and Osvaldo Becerra-Flores (ca11, 1990-12-18)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Roberto Mieres-Borges and Osvaldo Becerra-Flores (2×)
11th Cir. · 1990 · confidence medium
United States v. Lopez-Llerena, 721 F.2d 311, 312 (11th Cir.1983) (denial of rehearing), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1103 , 104 S.Ct. 1602 , 80 L.Ed.2d 132 (1984) (citing United States v. Pintado, 715 F.2d 1501, 1503 (11th Cir.1983); United States v. Blasco, 702 F.2d 1315, 1331-32 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 914 , 104 S.Ct. 275 , 276, 78 L.Ed.2d 256 (1983)). 23 We do not believe that sufficient evidence was presented by the government which, in addition to presence and flight, would allow a reasonable factfinder to conclude that Becerra-Flores was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Fulgencio Pantoja-Soto, Raul Pal-Sali, Nelio A. Nunez and Manuel Roberto Guerrero (2×)
11th Cir. · 1984 · confidence medium
United States v. Lopez-Llerena, 721 F.2d 311, 312 (11th Cir.1983); DeSimone, supra, 660 F.2d at 537 ; United States v. Flores, 564 F.2d 717, 718-19 (5th Cir.1977).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Oscar Castro, Charles David Fraga, Peter Diaz, and Thomas Acosta (2×)
11th Cir. · 1984 · confidence medium
Moreover, as was pointed out in United States v. Lopez-Llerena, 721 F.2d 311 at 312 (11th Cir.1983), both DeSimone and Lopez-Ortiz were decided prior to United States v. Bell, 678 F.2d 547 (5th Cir. Unit B 1982) (en banc ), aff'd on other grounds, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 2398 , 76 L.Ed.2d 638 (1983), which specifically held: 37 It is not necessary that the evidence exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence or be wholly inconsistent with every conclusion except that of guilt, provided a reasonable trier of fact could find that the evidence establishes guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Alberto Lopez-Llerena, Felix Parra, Jose Borges, Jose Delfin Mule Vasquez, Lazaro Cruz, Jr., Hector Theodore Valdes, Fausto Manuel Sanchez, Raul Pinera, Carlos Oliver-Chirino, and Jose Luis Marino
82-5916.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Aug 30, 1983.
721 F.2d 311
Published

721 F.2d 311

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Alberto LOPEZ-LLERENA, Felix Parra, Jose Borges, Jose Delfin
Mule Vasquez, Lazaro Cruz, Jr., Hector Theodore Valdes,
Fausto Manuel Sanchez, Raul Pinera, Carlos Oliver-Chirino,
and Jose Luis Marino, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 82-5916.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.

Aug. 30, 1983.

Weiner, Robbins, Tunkey & Ross, P.A., William R. Tunkey, Geoffrey C. Fleck, Miami, Fla., for Lopez-Llerena, Parra, and Borges.

Bruce H. Fleisher, Coral Gables, Fla., for Curuz, Valdes, Sanchez, Pinera and Chirino.

Mark King Leban, Miami, Fla., for Marino.

Stanley Marcus, U.S. Atty., Miami, Fla., Lurana Snow, Asst. U.S. Atty., Fort Lauderdale, Fla., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

Before FAY and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges, and ATKINS[*], District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

AFFIRMED; Circuit Rule 25. See United States v. Blasco, 702 F.2d 1315 (11th Cir.1983).

*

Honorable C. Clyde Atkins, U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of Florida, sitting by designation