Bolles v. Hamilton Cnty., 74 F. 207 (7th Cir. 1896). · Go Syfert
Bolles v. Hamilton Cnty., 74 F. 207 (7th Cir. 1896). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
16 citation events across 10 distinct courts.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
BOLLES
v.
HAMILTON COUNTY
No. 174.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
May 7, 1896.
74 F. 207
Geo. A. Sanders and Win. R. Bowers, for plaintiff in error., ,T. R. Williams and .T. M. Hamill, for defendant in error.
Jenkins, Showalter, Woods.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

This is an action of assumpsit upon coupons from bonus issued by the county of Hamilton, Ill., to the St. Louis & Southeastern Railway Company. Trial by jury was waived by written agreement, and the court made a general finding and gave judgment tor the plaintiff in error upon a part, but not upon all, of the coupons In suit. There is no special finding of fads, and in other respects also the record is the same as in the case of Woodbury V. City of Shawneetown. 71 Fed. 205. For the reasons there explained, no question is presented for consideration, and the judgment of the circuit court must be affirmed.