James A. Marshall v. United States, 262 F.2d 456 (D.C. Cir. 1959). · Go Syfert
Search
James A. Marshall v. United States, 262 F.2d 456 (D.C. Cir. 1959). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
32 citation events across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: National Labor Relations Board v. Local 269, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (ca3, 1966-02-04)
Treatment trajectory · 1958 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1958 1992 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) National Labor Relations Board v. Local 269, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
3rd Cir. · 1966 · confidence medium
D.C 359, 262 F.2d 456, 459-461 (1958).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) National Labor Relations Board v. Local 269, International Brotherhood Of Electrical Workers, Afl-Cio
3rd Cir. · 1966 · confidence medium
Wallace Corp. v. N.L.R.B., 323 U.S. 248, 253-255 , 65 S.Ct. 238 , 89 L.Ed. 216 (1944); International Brotherhood of Teamsters, etc., Local No. 554, AFL-CIO v. N.L.R.B., 104 U.S.App.D.C. 359 , 262 F.2d 456, 459-461 (1958). 20 As for the Association, there was substantial evidence on the record as a whole that it violated 8(a)(3) and (1) of the Act within the statutory period.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Local No. 636, Etc. v. National Labor Relations Board
D.C. Cir. · 1960 · confidence medium
We think it should apply only to conduct in relation to United Engineers and Constructors, Inc., and should not extend to relations with "any other employer." International Brotherhood of Teamsters, etc., Local No. 554, AFL-CIO v. National Labor Relations Board, 104 U.S.App.D.C. 359, 365 , 262 F.2d 456, 460, 462 ; International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 150 v. National Labor Relations Board, 107 U.S.App.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Local No. 636, United Association of Journeymen & Apprentices of Plumbing & Pipe Fitting Industry v. National Labor Relations Board
D.C. Cir. · 1960 · confidence medium
We think it should apply only to conduct in relation to United Engineers and Constructors, Inc., and should not extend to relations with “any other employer.” International Brotherhood of Teamsters, etc., Local No. 554, AFL-CIO v. National Labor Relations Board, 104 U.S.App.D.C. 359, 365 , 262 F.2d 456, 460, 462 ; International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 150 v. National Labor Relations Board, 107 U.S.App.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
James A. MARSHALL, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
14604.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Mar 23, 1959.
262 F.2d 456
Mr. Jerrold Scoutt, Jr., Washington, D. C. (appointed by this court), for appellant., Mr. Edgar T. Bellinger, Asst. U. S. Atty., with whom Mr. Oliver Gasch, U. S. Atty., and Mr. Carl W. Belcher, Asst. U. S. Atty., were on the brief, for ap-pellee.
Danaher, Edgerton, Per Curiam, Prettyman.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a denial of a motion filed in the District Court under Section 2255, Title 28, United States Code. Appellant says his trial counsel failed to call a certain person as a witness and that his attorney, after the verdict, argued on behalf of both appellant and a co-defendant, also convicted, in respect to the sentence to be imposed. Despite the earnest and skillful presentation of appellant’s points by counsel appointed to represent him on appeal, we find no error.

Affirmed.