green
Positive treatment
0.7 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
White v. Marine Transport Lines, Inc.
See, e.g., Jarvis v. United States, 342 F.2d 799 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 831 , 86 S.Ct. 70 , 15 L.Ed.2d 75 (1965); Arrufat v. Panama Canal Co., 199 F.Supp. 832 (S.D.N.Y.1961); Swenarski v. United States, 124 F.Supp. 200 (N.D.Cal.1954); Mayo v. United States, 139 F.Supp. 46 (N.D.Cal.1956); Hartzog v. United States, 139 F.Supp. 47 (N.D.Cal.1956); Amell v. United States, 384 U.S. 158 , 86 S.Ct. 1384 , 16 L.Ed.2d 445 (1966). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mrs. Charles JARVIS Et Al., Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES of America Et Al., Appellees
v.
UNITED STATES of America Et Al., Appellees
20696.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Mar 29, 1965.
Raymond H. Kierr, New Orleans, La., Richard S. Salzman, Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., Kierr & Gainsburgh, New Orleans, La., for appellants., Richard S. Salzman, Allan J. Weiss, Attys., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., Kathleen Ruddell, Asst. U. S. Atty., New Orleans, La., Leavenworth Colby, Morton Hollander, Attys., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., John W. Douglas, Asst. Atty. Gen., Louis C. LaCour, U. S. Atty., for appellees.
Tuttle, Jones, Anderson.
Cited by 9 opinions | Published
PER CURIAM:
Upon careful consideration of this appeal, we conclude that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. We can add nothing to the reasoning of the trial court, and, therefore, approve the opinion and adopt it as the opinion of this Court. See Petition of the United States of America Represented by Inland Waterways Corporation, a Government Agency; and, the Inland Waterways Corporation, a Government Agency, Wholly Owned by the United States, Created by Act of Congress as a Corporation of Columbia, the Documented Owner of the River Towboat Natchez, for Exoneration from, and/or Limitation of Liability 212 F.Supp. 214.
The judgment is affirmed.