green
Positive treatment
7.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Associated Builders & Contractors, Saginaw Valley Area Chapter v. Perry
Where such uncertainty exists, one whose interests have been affected adversely by a district court’s decision should be entitled to “receive the protection of appellate review.” Zuber v. Allen, 387 F.2d 862, 863 (D.C.Cir.1967) (per curiam).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Associated Builders And Contractors v. Perry
Where such uncertainty exists, one whose interests have been affected adversely by a district court's decision should be entitled to "receive the protection of appellate review." Zuber v. Allen, 387 F.2d 862, 863 (D.C.Cir.1967) (per curiam).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Knable v. Wilson
It can hardly be suggested that there has not been time to make the effort, since about six years have elapsed since the incidents complained of, and almost five years since this litigation was commenced. .See Smuck v. Hobson, 132 U.S.App.D.C. 372, 375-379 , 408 F.2d 175, 178-182 (en banc 1969); Zuber v. Allen, 128 U.S.App.D.C. 297, 298 , 387 F.2d 862, 863 (1967); Wolpe v. Poretsky, 79 U.S.App.D.C. 141, 143-144 , 144 F.2d 505, 507-508 , cert. denied, 323 U.S. 777 , 65 S.Ct. 190 , 89 L.Ed. 621 (1944).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
In Re Jeffrey L. Knable, Jeffrey L. Knable v. Jerry v. Wilson, Chief, Metropolitan Police Department
It can hardly be suggested that there has not been time to make the effort, since about six years have elapsed since the incidents complained of, and almost five years since this litigation was commenced 48 See Smuck v. Hobson, 132 U.S.App.D.C. 372, 375-379 , 408 F.2d 175, 178-182 (en banc 1969); Zuber v. Allen, 128 U.S.App.D.C. 297, 298 , 387 F.2d 862, 863 (1967); Wolpe v. Poretsky, 79 U.S.App.D.C. 141, 143-144 , 144 F.2d 505, 507-508 , cert. denied, 323 U.S. 777 , 65 S.Ct. 190 , 89 L.Ed. 621 (1944)
cited
Cited "see"
Maria-Kelly F. Yniguez Jaime P. Gutierrez v. State of Arizona, Robert D. Parks Arizonans for Official English, Applicants in Intervention-Appellants. Maria-Kelly F. Yniguez Jaime P. Gutierrez v. Rose Mofford, Individually and as Governor of the State of Arizona Robert Corbin, Individually and as Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Robert D. Parks Arizonans for Official English, Applicants in Intervention-Appellees
See Zuber v. Allen, 387 F.2d 862, 863 (D.C.Cir.1967); Pellegrino v. Nesbit, 203 F.2d 463 (9th Cir.1953).
cited
Cited "see"
Yniguez v. Arizona
See Zuber v. Allen, 387 F.2d 862, 863 (D.C.Cir.1967); Pellegrino v. Nesbit, 203 F.2d 463 (9th Cir.1953).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smuck v. Hobson
See Zuber v. Allen, 128 U.S.App.D.C. 297 , 387 F.2d 862 (1967) ; Pellegrino v. Nesbit, 203 F.2d 463 , 37 A.L.R.2d 1296 (9th Cir. 1953) ; Wolpe v. Poretsky, 79 U.S.App.D.C. 141 , 144 F.2d 505 , cert. denied, 323 U.S. 777 , 67 S.Ct. 69 , 91 L.Ed. 627 (1944). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Carl C. Smuck, a Member of the Board of Education of the District of Columbia v. Julius W. Hobson, Carl F. Hansen, Superintendent of Schools of the District of Columbia v. Julius W. Hobson
See Shapiro, supra note 9, at 729-731; Kaplan, supra note 10, at 403-407 17 Cf. Shapiro, supra note 9, at 740, 752-756 18 In providing for the first time for an elected school board in the District, Congress has recognized that 'the education of their children is a municipal matter of primary and personal concern to the citizens of a community.' District of Columbia Elected Board of Education Act 2, 82 Stat. 101 (1968) 19 See Pellegrino v. Nesbit, 203 F.2d 463, 467 , 37 A.L.R.2d 1296 (9th Cir. 1953) 20 Textile Workers Union, etc. v. Allendale Co., 96 U.S.App.d.C. 401, 403, 226 F.2d 765, 767 (1…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dennis MORA Et Al., Appellants,
v.
Robert McNAMARA, Secretary of Defense Et Al., Appellees
v.
Robert McNAMARA, Secretary of Defense Et Al., Appellees
20420_1.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Feb 20, 1967.
Mrs. Selma W. Samols, Washington, D. C., filed pleadings for appellants., Messrs Alan S. Rosenthal and Richard S. Salzman, Attorneys, Department of Justice, filed pleadings for appellees.
Miller, Burger, Coffin.
Cited by 8 opinions | Published
JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM.On consideration of appellees’ motion to affirm the judgment of the District Court and it appearing that proceedings in this appeal were ordered held in abeyance and that a similar judgment would be entered in this case upon the entry of a judgment in the case of Luftig v. McNamara et al., 126 U.S.App.D.C. 4, 373 F.2d 664, and it appearing that a judgment in said case was filed on February 6, 1967, it is
Ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the District Court appealed from in this cause be and it is hereby affirmed.