Dennis Mora v. Robert McNamara Sec'y of Def., 387 F.2d 862 (D.C. Cir. 1967). · Go Syfert
Dennis Mora v. Robert McNamara Sec'y of Def., 387 F.2d 862 (D.C. Cir. 1967). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
32 citation events across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Associated Builders & Contractors, Saginaw Valley Area Chapter v. Perry (ca6, 1997-06-05)
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968 1997 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Associated Builders & Contractors, Saginaw Valley Area Chapter v. Perry
6th Cir. · 1997 · confidence medium
Where such uncertainty exists, one whose interests have been affected adversely by a district court’s decision should be entitled to “receive the protection of appellate review.” Zuber v. Allen, 387 F.2d 862, 863 (D.C.Cir.1967) (per curiam).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Associated Builders And Contractors v. Perry
6th Cir. · 1997 · confidence medium
Where such uncertainty exists, one whose interests have been affected adversely by a district court's decision should be entitled to "receive the protection of appellate review." Zuber v. Allen, 387 F.2d 862, 863 (D.C.Cir.1967) (per curiam).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Knable v. Wilson
D.C. Cir. · 1977 · confidence medium
It can hardly be suggested that there has not been time to make the effort, since about six years have elapsed since the incidents complained of, and almost five years since this litigation was commenced. .See Smuck v. Hobson, 132 U.S.App.D.C. 372, 375-379 , 408 F.2d 175, 178-182 (en banc 1969); Zuber v. Allen, 128 U.S.App.D.C. 297, 298 , 387 F.2d 862, 863 (1967); Wolpe v. Poretsky, 79 U.S.App.D.C. 141, 143-144 , 144 F.2d 505, 507-508 , cert. denied, 323 U.S. 777 , 65 S.Ct. 190 , 89 L.Ed. 621 (1944).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) In Re Jeffrey L. Knable, Jeffrey L. Knable v. Jerry v. Wilson, Chief, Metropolitan Police Department
D.C. Cir. · 1977 · confidence medium
It can hardly be suggested that there has not been time to make the effort, since about six years have elapsed since the incidents complained of, and almost five years since this litigation was commenced 48 See Smuck v. Hobson, 132 U.S.App.D.C. 372, 375-379 , 408 F.2d 175, 178-182 (en banc 1969); Zuber v. Allen, 128 U.S.App.D.C. 297, 298 , 387 F.2d 862, 863 (1967); Wolpe v. Poretsky, 79 U.S.App.D.C. 141, 143-144 , 144 F.2d 505, 507-508 , cert. denied, 323 U.S. 777 , 65 S.Ct. 190 , 89 L.Ed. 621 (1944)
cited Cited "see" Yniguez v. Arizona
9th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Zuber v. Allen, 387 F.2d 862, 863 (D.C.Cir.1967); Pellegrino v. Nesbit, 203 F.2d 463 (9th Cir.1953).
discussed Cited "see" Smuck v. Hobson
D.C. Cir. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See Zuber v. Allen, 128 U.S.App.D.C. 297 , 387 F.2d 862 (1967) ; Pellegrino v. Nesbit, 203 F.2d 463 , 37 A.L.R.2d 1296 (9th Cir. 1953) ; Wolpe v. Poretsky, 79 U.S.App.D.C. 141 , 144 F.2d 505 , cert. denied, 323 U.S. 777 , 67 S.Ct. 69 , 91 L.Ed. 627 (1944). .
discussed Cited "see" Carl C. Smuck, a Member of the Board of Education of the District of Columbia v. Julius W. Hobson, Carl F. Hansen, Superintendent of Schools of the District of Columbia v. Julius W. Hobson
D.C. Cir. · 1969 · signal: accord · confidence high
See Shapiro, supra note 9, at 729-731; Kaplan, supra note 10, at 403-407 17 Cf. Shapiro, supra note 9, at 740, 752-756 18 In providing for the first time for an elected school board in the District, Congress has recognized that 'the education of their children is a municipal matter of primary and personal concern to the citizens of a community.' District of Columbia Elected Board of Education Act 2, 82 Stat. 101 (1968) 19 See Pellegrino v. Nesbit, 203 F.2d 463, 467 , 37 A.L.R.2d 1296 (9th Cir. 1953) 20 Textile Workers Union, etc. v. Allendale Co., 96 U.S.App.d.C. 401, 403, 226 F.2d 765, 767 (1…
discussed Cited "see" Cranston v. Freeman (2×)
N.D.N.Y. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
See Zuber v. Allen, 387 F.2d 862 (D.C.Cir.1967).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dennis MORA Et Al., Appellants,
v.
Robert McNAMARA, Secretary of Defense Et Al., Appellees
20420_1.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Feb 20, 1967.
387 F.2d 862
Mrs. Selma W. Samols, Washington, D. C., filed pleadings for appellants., Messrs Alan S. Rosenthal and Richard S. Salzman, Attorneys, Department of Justice, filed pleadings for appellees.
Miller, Burger, Coffin.
Cited by 8 opinions  |  Published

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of appellees’ motion to affirm the judgment of the District Court and it appearing that proceedings in this appeal were ordered held in abeyance and that a similar judgment would be entered in this case upon the entry of a judgment in the case of Luftig v. McNamara et al., 126 U.S.App.D.C. 4, 373 F.2d 664, and it appearing that a judgment in said case was filed on February 6, 1967, it is

Ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the District Court appealed from in this cause be and it is hereby affirmed.