neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
0.6 score
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
John Scott MAYHEW, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
22257_1.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Sep 11, 1968.
399 F.2d 158
Adolph Bustos, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant., Wm. M. Byrne, Jr., U. S. Atty., Robert L. Brosio, Asst. U. S. Atty., Criminal Division, John W. Hombeck, Asst. U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Barnes, Hamlin, Kilkenny, Per Curiam.
Published
PER CURIAM:
The appeal in the above matter having been submitted on the briefs on file, and having examined such briefs, we find no merit in the alleged error relied on by appellant, and the judgment of conviction is affirmed.