green
Positive treatment
1.5 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Alderman v. Iditarod Properties, Inc.
See Franklin Knitting Mills, Inc. v. Fashionit Sweater Mills, Inc., 297 F. 247, 248 (S.D.N.Y.1923), aff'd, 4 F.2d 1018 (2d Cir.1925) (concluding that "Fashionknit" was descriptive of fash-fonable sweaters). 56 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Eli Lilly and Co. v. Revlon, Inc.
See, e.g., Franklin Knitting Mills, Inc. v. Fashionit Sweater Mills, Inc., 297 F. 247, 248 (2d Cir.1923), aff'd, 4 F.2d 1018 (2d Cir.1925).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Plus Products v. Plus Discount Foods, Inc.
See e.g., Franklin Knitting Mills, Inc. v. Fashionit Sweater Mills, Inc., 297 F. 247, 248 (2d Cir.1923), aff’d, 4 F.2d 1018 (2d Cir.1925).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
FRANKLIN KNITTING MILLS, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
FASHIONIT SWEATER MILLS, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.
v.
FASHIONIT SWEATER MILLS, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.
130.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Jan 5, 1925.
Rogers, Hough, and Manton, Circuit Judges.
Cited by 5 opinions | Published
Harold R. Lhowe, of New York City (Edward M. Evarts, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
Abraham J. Halprin, of New York City (William E. Warland, of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.
Before ROGERS, HOUGH, and MANTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Decree (297 F. 247) affirmed.