William Nicholas Karcher v. United States, 404 F.2d 343 (5th Cir. 1969). · Go Syfert
Search
William Nicholas Karcher v. United States, 404 F.2d 343 (5th Cir. 1969). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
19 citation events across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States Ex Rel. Delta Metals, Inc. v. R. M. Wells Co. (gasd, 1980-09-24)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" United States Ex Rel. Delta Metals, Inc. v. R. M. Wells Co.
S.D. Ga. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Alpha —Continental, 273 F.Supp. 758, 774 (E.D.N.C.1967), aff’d, 404 F.2d 343 (4th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 922 , 89 S.Ct. 1774 , 23 L.Ed.2d 239 (1969).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." The United States of America, for the Use of C.J.C., Inc., a New Mexico Corporation v. Western States Mechanical Contractors, Inc., a New Mexico Corporation Commercial Union Insurance Co., a Massachusetts Corporation and Sandia Corporation, a New Mexico Corporation, D/B/A Sandia National Laboratories, United States of America, for the Use of Hugg Surveying Co., Plaintiff v. Western States Mechanical Contractors, Inc., a New Mexico Corporation and Commercial Union Insurance Co., a Massachusetts Corporation, Defendants- United States of America, for the Use of Hugg Surveying Co., Plaintiff v. Western States Mechanical Contractors, Inc., a New Mexico Corporation and Commercial Union Insurance Co., a Massachusetts Corporation, Defendants- the United States of America, for the Use of C.J.C., Inc., a New Mexico Corporation v. Western States Mechanical Contractors, Inc., a New Mexico Corporation and Commercial Union Insurance Co., a Massachusetts Corporation, Defendants- United States of America, for the Use of Fred Sanchez Construction Company v. Western States Mechanical Contractors, Inc., a New Mexico Corporation and Commercial Union Insurance Co., a Massachusetts Corporation, Defendants
10th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see also · confidence low
Rentals Corp. v. Western Casualty and Surety Co., 498 F.2d 335, 338 (9th Cir.1974); Coastal Steel, 479 F.2d at 641 ; Wynne v. United States ex rel Mid-States Waterproofing Co., Inc., 382 F.2d 699, 701 (10th Cir.1967); see also United States ex rel Robinson v. Alpha-Continental, 273 F.Supp. 758, 777-78 (E.D.N.C.1967) (quantum meruit recovery based on subcontractor's invoices), aff'd, 404 F.2d 343 (4th Cir.1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 922 , 89 S.Ct. 1774 , 23 L.Ed.2d 239 (1969); 12 Williston on Contracts Secs. 1480, 1482 (3d ed. 1970) (contract price is important evidence of the value of the pe…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
William Nicholas KARCHER, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
25879.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Apr 7, 1969.
404 F.2d 343
Max P. Engel, Jack L. Taffer, Engel & Pollack, Miami, Fla., for appellant., Mitchell Rogovin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Grant W. Wiprud, Marian Halley, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Theodore Klein, Asst. U. S. Atty., William A. Meadows, Jr., U. S. Atty., Miami, Fla., for appellee.
Tuttle, Ainsworth, Mitchell.
Published
PER CURIAM:

We conclude that the evidence as to identification of the appellant was ample to warrant submission of the case to the jury. While the conduct of the prosecuting officer in raising the defendant’s right hand to permit the prosecuting witness to see the ring he was wearing was not excusable, we do not think it created prejudicial error. See United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218, 87 S.Ct. 1926, 18 L.Ed.2d 1149; Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757, 86 S.Ct. 1826, 16 L.Ed.2d 908; Holt v. U. S., 218 U.S. 245, 31 S.Ct. 2, 54 L.Ed. 1021. 1021.

We find that there was ample basis for the trial court to conclude that the Miranda, warning was properly given.

The judgment is affirmed.