Arthur L. Liman, as Tr. in Bankr. of A. H. Bull S.S. Co. v. Am. S.S. Owners Mut. Prot. & Indem. Ass'n, Inc., 417 F.2d 627 (2d Cir. 1969). · Go Syfert
Search
Arthur L. Liman, as Tr. in Bankr. of A. H. Bull S.S. Co. v. Am. S.S. Owners Mut. Prot. & Indem. Ass'n, Inc., 417 F.2d 627 (2d Cir. 1969). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
34 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Dicola v. American Steamship Owners Mutual Protection & Indemnity Ass'n (In Re Prudential Lines, Inc.) (nysd, 1994-07-29)
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969 1997 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Dicola v. American Steamship Owners Mutual Protection & Indemnity Ass'n (In Re Prudential Lines, Inc.)
S.D.N.Y. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Liman v. American Steamship Owners Mutual Protection and Indemnity Associations, 299 F.Supp. 106 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd 417 F.2d 627 (2d Cir.1969) (per curiam), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 936 , 90 S.Ct. 946 , 25 L.Ed.2d 116 (1970). 3 .
discussed Cited "see" In Re McLean Industries, Inc.
Bankr. S.D.N.Y. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Liman v. American Steamship Owners Mutual Protection & Indemnity Ass’n, 299 F.Supp. 106 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d, 417 F.2d 627 (2d Cir.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 936 , 90 S.Ct. 946 , 25 L.Ed.2d 116 (1970).
cited Cited "see" Federal Insurance v. Cablevision Systems Development Co.
E.D.N.Y · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Liman v. American Steamship Owners Mutual Protection & Indemnity Assoc., 299 F.Supp. 106, 108 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd 417 F.2d 627 (2d Cir.1969) (per curiam). 6 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Ahmed v. American Steamship Owners Mutual Protection & Indemnity Ass'n
N.D. Cal. · 1978 · signal: see also · confidence low
Cucurillo v. American Steamship Owners Mutual Protection and Indemnity Association, Inc., 1969 A.M.C. 2834 (Sup.Ct., New York County 1969) (involving an insurance policy of defendant with substantially the same language as herein); see also, Liman v. American Steamship Owners Mutual Protection and Indemnity Association, Inc., 299 F.Supp. 106 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d, 417 F.2d 627 (2d Cir. 1969) (per curiam), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 936 , 90 S.Ct. 946 , 25 L.Ed.2d 116 (1970).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Arthur L. Liman, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of A. H. Bull Steamship Co.
v.
American Steamship Owners Mutual Protection and Indemnity Association, Inc.
33605.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Oct 24, 1969.
417 F.2d 627
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

417 F.2d 627

Arthur L. LIMAN, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of A. H. Bull
Steamship Co., Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
AMERICAN STEAMSHIP OWNERS MUTUAL PROTECTION AND INDEMNITY
ASSOCIATION, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 156, Docket 33605.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued Oct. 15, 1969.
Decided Oct. 24, 1969.

Ambrose Doskow, New York City, (Rosenman, Colin, Kaye, Pteschek, Freund & Emil, Peter F. Nadel, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellee.

Louis J. Gusmano, New York City, (Kirlin, Campbell & Keating, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellant.

Before FRIENDLY, HAYS and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

The issue on this appeal from a judgment of the District Court for the Southern District of New York is whether the court properly granted a declaratory judgment that the indemnity insurer of A. H. Bull Steamship Company, now in bankruptcy in that court, is obligated to indemnify the Trustee for the payment of personal injury claims within the scope of the policies. These contain a $1,000 deductible and the Trustee has arranged that upon his payment of a judgment against the estate the claimant will repay $1,000 and become a general creditor for that amount. The insurer argues that all the insured is paying is the net amount plus its expenses and that it is entitled to deduct $1,000 from that sum rather than from the gross recovery and expenses. Judge Mansfield, in a well-considered opinion, 299 F.Supp. 106, held the contrary. We agree and can find nothing to add.

2

Judgment affirmed.