green
Positive treatment
2.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Chrysler Credit Corporation v. First National Bank And Trust Company Of Washington
See, Central Bank and Trust Co. v. First Northwest Bank, 332 F.Supp. 1166 , aff'd, 458 F.2d 511 (8th Cir.1972) (Sec. 4-302 imposes strict liability upon payor bank). 4 V. 44 Finally, judgment will be entered for First National at count 11 because plaintiff has failed to prove fraud or conspiracy to defraud by clear proof.
cited
Cited "see"
Chrysler Credit Corp. v. First National Bank & Trust Co.
See, Central Bank and Trust Co. v. First Northwest Bank, 332 F.Supp. 1166 , aff'd, 458 F.2d 511 (8th Cir.1972) (§ 4-302 imposes strict liability upon payor bank). 4 Y.
cited
Cited "see"
Chrysler Credit Corp. v. First National Bank & Trust Co.
See, Central Bank and Trust Co. v. First Northwest Bank, 332 F.Supp. 1166 , affd, 458 F.2d 511 (8th Cir.1972) (§ 4-302 imposes strict liability upon payor bank). 4 V.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Wagner
See Central Bank & Trust Co. v. First Northwest Bank, 332 F.Supp. 1166 (E.D.Mo.1971), aff'd, 458 F.2d 511 (8th Cir. 1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
American Title Insurance v. Burke & Herbert Bank & Trust Co.
See e.g., Central Bank & Trust Co. v. First Northwest Bank, 332 F.Supp. 1166 (E.D.Mo. 1971), aff'd 458 F.2d 511 (8th Cir.1972) (applying Alabama and Missouri law); Leaderbrand v. Central State Bank, 202 Kan. 450 , 450 P.2d 1 (1969); Raymer v. Bay State Nat.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
American National Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago, N.A. v. Central Bank of Denver, N.A.
See e.g., Central Bank and Trust Co. v. First Northwest Bank, 332 F.Supp. 1166 (E.D.Mo.1971), aff'd, 458 F.2d 511 (8th Cir.1972).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wendell Asbury BRUCE, Jr., Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
71-1345.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
May 15, 1972.
Jack F. McGuinn, Columbia, S. C. (Court-appointed counsel), for appellant., Robert G. Clawson, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty. (John K. Grisso, U. S. Atty., on brief), for appellee.
Boreman, Winter, Russell.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
PER CURIAM:
In a previous appeal we remanded this ease to the district court for a full evi-dentiary hearing to determine whether defendant, who was convicted for refusing to report for induction, was ordered to report for induction illegally, in that the order was accelerated by reason of his delinquency. Bruce v. United States, 448 F.2d 21 (4 Cir. 1971). We find no error in the district court’s factual determination that defendant’s induction had not been accelerated.
We find no merit in defendant’s other contentions on which decision was reserved in the prior appeal.
Affirmed.