Hodgson v. Baltimore Reg'l Jt. Bd., 462 F.2d 180 (4th Cir. 1972). · Go Syfert
Search
Hodgson v. Baltimore Reg'l Jt. Bd., 462 F.2d 180 (4th Cir. 1972). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
19 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Tuma v. American Can Company (njd, 1973-04-26)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Tuma v. American Can Company
D.N.J. · 1973 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hodgson v. Sagner, Inc., 326 F.Supp. 371 (D.Md.1971), aff’d sub nom., Hodgson v. Baltimore Regional Joint Board, 462 F.2d 180 (4th Cir. 1972).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Rosemarie Denicola v. G. C. Murphy Company, Appellee-Cross and General Teamsters, Chauffeurs and Helpers, Local Union 249, Appellant-Cross
3rd Cir. · 1977 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Wirtz v. Hayes Industries, Inc., 1 E.P.D. ¶ 9874, at 1089 (N.D.Ohio 1968), with Hodgson v. Sagner, Inc., 326 F.Supp. 371 (D.Md.1971), aff’d sub nom., Hodgson v. Baltimore Regional Joint Board, Amalgamated Clothing Workers, 462 F.2d 180 (4th Cir. 1972) (Per Curiam).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor
v.
Baltimore Regional Joint Board, Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, Afl-Cio
71-1728.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Jun 16, 1972.
462 F.2d 180
Cited by 6 opinions  |  Published

462 F.2d 180

9 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 770,
20 Wage & Hour Cas. (BN 697,
4 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 7880, 68 Lab.Cas. P 32,711

James D. HODGSON, Secretary of Labor, United States
Department of Labor, Appellee,
v.
BALTIMORE REGIONAL JOINT BOARD, AMALGAMATED CLOTHING WORKERS
OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, Appellant.

No. 71-1728.

United States Court of Appeals,

Fourth Circuit.

Argued May 30, 1972.
Decided June 16, 1972.

Bernard W. Rubenstein, Baltimore, Md. (Jacob J. Edelman, Bernard P. Jeweler, and Edelman, Levy, & Rubenstein, Baltimore, Md. on brief), for appellant.

Carin Ann Clauss, Asst. Sol., U. S. Department of Labor (Richard F. Schubert, Solicitor of Labor, Donald S. Shire, Anastasia T. Dunau, Sylvia S. Ellison, Attys., Washington, D. C., and Louis Weiner, Regional Sol., on brief), for appellee.

Before SOBELOFF, Senior Circuit Judge, and WINTER and CRAVEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

The Baltimore Regional Joint Board, Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, AFL-CIO [Union] prosecutes this appeal from a judgment of the District Court imposing upon it joint and several liability with Sagner, Inc., a clothing manufacturer. The employer discriminated against certain women employees by paying them less than their male counterparts for equivalent work. Sagner finally admitted the discrimination and offered to make restitution. But at the instigation of the appellant Union and in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C. Sec. 201 et seq., the major part of the arrearage due was diverted to increase the pay of another group of employees also represented by the Union.

2

For reasons sufficiently indicated by the District Court, Hodgson v. Sagner, Inc., 326 F.Supp. 371 (D.Md.1971), we agree that the court was within its general equitable powers in imposing such liability upon the Union. The judgment is therefore

3

Affirmed.