Joseph Skidmore, Jr. v. Travelers Ins. Co., 483 F.2d 67 (5th Cir. 1973). · Go Syfert
Search
Joseph Skidmore, Jr. v. Travelers Ins. Co., 483 F.2d 67 (5th Cir. 1973). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
28 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 14 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Alexander v. United States (txnd, 2022-05-18)
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973 1999 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Alexander v. United States
N.D. Tex. · 2022 · confidence medium
See Ordonez v. United States, 588 F.2d 448, 449 (5th Cir. 1979); Savage v. United States, 483 F.2d 67, 68 (5th Cir. 1973).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. John Erwin Beck (84-5545) Dale Kerry Madsen (84-5546)
6th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Savage, 459 F.2d 60 (5th Cir. 1972) (per curiam), vacated and reaff'd, 483 F.2d 67 (5th Cir. 1973) (per curiam), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 949 , 94 S.Ct. 1470 (1974), wherein the Fifth Circuit rejected the same arguments asserted herein.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Jess Harlan White
5th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Savage, 459 F.2d 60 (5th Cir.1972), vacated on other grounds and reaffirmed, 483 F.2d 67 (1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 949 , 94 S.Ct. 1470 , 39 L.Ed.2d 564 (1974).
cited Cited "see" Horn v. C. L. Osborn Contracting Co.
M.D. Ga. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See Skidmore v. Travelers Insurance Company, 356 F.Supp. 670, at 672 (D.C.E.D.La., 1973), affm’d, 483 F.2d 67 (5 Cir. 1973).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Joseph SKIDMORE, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
73-2100.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Aug 17, 1973.
483 F.2d 67
Louis R. Koerner, Jr., New Orleans, La., for plaintiff-appellant., Ashton R. Hardy, New Orleans, La., for defendants-appellees.
Wisdom, Ainsworth, Clark.
Cited by 5 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM:

The complaint in this case rest on the theory that the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, 29 U.S.C. §§ 651-678, carries an implied private remedy against executive officers of an employer guilty of violating the Act. For the reasons stated in the opinion of the district court we hold that the Act does not create such an implied remedy. See 356 F.Supp. 670.

Affirmed.