Meredith Corp. v. Harper & Row, 500 F.2d 1221 (2d Cir. 1974). · Go Syfert
Search
Meredith Corp. v. Harper & Row, 500 F.2d 1221 (2d Cir. 1974). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
29 citation events across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enterprises (scotus, 1985-05-20)
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974 2000 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enterprises (2×)
SCOTUS · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Meredith Corp. v. Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc., 378 F. Supp. 686, 690 (SDNY) (purpose of text was to compete with original), aff'd, 500 F. 2d 1221 (CA2 1974).
discussed Cited "see" Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enterprises (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
2d Cir. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wainwright Securities, Inc. v. Wall Street Transcript Corp., supra, 558 F.2d at 94 , and Meredith Corp. v. Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc., 378 F.Supp. 686 (S.D.N.Y.1974), aff’d, 500 F.2d 1221 (2d Cir.1974).
discussed Cited "see" Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enterprises (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
2d Cir. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wainwright Securities, Inc. v. Wall Street Transcript Corp., supra, 558 F.2d at 94 , and Meredith Corp. v. Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc., 378 F.Supp. 686 (S.D.N.Y.1974), aff'd, 500 F.2d 1221 (2d Cir.1974).
discussed Cited "see" Werlin v. Reader's Digest Ass'n, Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
Hand, J.), cert. *463 denied, 282 U.S. 902 , 51 S.Ct. 216 , 75 L.Ed. 795 (1931); see Meredith Corp. v. Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc., 378 F.Supp. 686, 690 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d per curiam, 500 F.2d 1221 (2d Cir. 1974).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Meredith Corporation, an Iowa Corporation
v.
Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc., Brian Sutton-Smith, an Individual, and Prentice-Hall, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Additional on Counterclaim-Appellants
1228.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Jul 8, 1974.
500 F.2d 1221
Published

500 F.2d 1221

182 U.S.P.Q. 577

MEREDITH CORPORATION, an Iowa corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
HARPER & ROW, PUBLISHERS, INC., et al.,
Defendants-Appellees, Brian Sutton-Smith, an
Individual, and Prentice-Hall, Inc., a
Delaware corporation,
Additional
Defendants
on
Counterclaim-Appellants.

No. 1228, Docket 74-1726.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued June 26, 1974.
Decided July 8, 1974.

Marshall C. Berger, New York, City (Hahn, Hessen, Margolis & Ryan, New York City, Molinare, Allegretti, Newitt & Witcoff, Chicago, Ill., William J. Daly, Jr., New York City, George B. Newitt, George P. McAndrews, Chicago, Ill., Wayne Carson, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellant and additional defendants-appellants.

John C. Lankenau, New York City (Lankenau, Kovner, Bickford & Beer, Victor A. Kovner, Edward A. Miller, Nathaniel J. Bickford, New York City, on the brief), for defendants-appellees.

Before MOORE and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges, and PALMIERI,[1] district judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

The appellants assert error in the grant of a preliminary injunction.

2

This is essentially a dispute between the publishers of competing textbooks in the child development field. The defendants-appellees, seeking redress as copyright holders, convinced Judge Owen upon a persuasive factual record that they would probably succeed on the merits, that the appellants had plagiarized their textbook, and that there was need for immediate relief. There was a sufficient basis for the findings and conclusions of the District Court and since they are not clearly erroneous, Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a), we affirm.

1

Of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation