green
Positive treatment
0.7 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lieberman v. Gant
As was stated in a case which is factually similar to the one at bar: “The Roth decision . . . laid to rest the legal question of procedural due process as it applies to the non-reappointment of non-tenured professors in that it holds that procedural due process does not require a statement of reasons and a hearing.” Waifs v. Board of Curators, University of Missouri, 363 F.Supp. 883, 888 (W.D.Mo.1973), aff’d 495 F.2d 384 (8th Cir. 1974); see also Cotten v. Board of Regents, 395 F.Supp. 388, 393 (S.D.Ga. 1974), aff’d 515 F.2d 1098 (5th Cir. 1975).
Marion Dev. Cotten
v.
Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia
v.
Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia
74-2932.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Jul 9, 1975.
Published
Marion deV. COTTEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
BOARD OF REGENTS OF the UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 74-2932.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
July 9, 1975.
John B. Long, Augusta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellant.
Gould B. Hagler, Augusta, Ga., for Moretz and Curtis.
Alfred L. Evans, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Atlanta, Ga., for defendants-appellees.
Before GODBOLD, Circuit Judge, SKELTON, Associate Judge,[*] and GEE, Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
1
We agree with the findings and legal conclusions of the district court, which appear at --- F.Supp. ---. The judgment is
2
Affirmed.
*
Of the U. S. Court of Claims, sitting by designation