green
Positive treatment
1.3 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. La Monte
United States v. Hunley, 567 F.2d 822, 825 (8th Cir. 1977); United States v. Swihart, 554 F.2d 264, 268-69 (6th Cir. 1977); United States v. Simmons, 444 F.Supp. 500, 505 (E.D.Pa. 1978); see United States v. Darensbourg, 520 F.2d 985, 988-89 , modified, 524 F.2d 233 (5th Cir. 1975); United States v. Burke, 517 F.2d 377, 380-81 (2d Cir. 1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Simmons
See United States v. Darensbourg, 520 F.2d 985, 988-89 (5th Cir.), modified, 524 F.2d 233 (5 Cir. 1975); United States v. Burke, 517 F.2d 377, 380-81 (2d Cir. 1975). *506 It is unnecessary to reach this issue in the instant case since the affidavit satisfies the Aguiiar-Spinelii test. 7 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
BOB BRITT LUMBER CO., INC., Respondent
v.
BOB BRITT LUMBER CO., INC., Respondent
74-2194.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Oct 28, 1975.
524 F.2d 233
Michael Messitte, N.L.R.B., San Francisco, Cal. (argued), for petitioner., Robert J. Scolnik, San Francisco, Cal. (argued), for respondent.
Merrill, Koelsch, Smith.
Published
ORDER
Before MERRILL and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges, and SMITH, * District Judge.The order of the National Labor Relations Board issued November 13, 1973, and reported at 207 NLRB No. 35 is enforced in full.