Horacio Ramos Miranda v. United States Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 694 F.2d 1171 (9th Cir. 1982). · Go Syfert
Search
Horacio Ramos Miranda v. United States Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 694 F.2d 1171 (9th Cir. 1982). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“the validity of these specific conditions is at the heart of this case”
38 citation events (20 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Natural Resources Defense Council v. Patterson (caed, 1992-04-30)
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) Natural Resources Defense Council v. Patterson (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
E.D. Cal. · 1992 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
the validity of these specific conditions is at the heart of this case
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Natural Resources Defense Council v. Kempthorne
E.D. Cal. · 2009 · confidence medium
In light of the principle that findings of preemption should be avoided whenever possible, see United States v. SWRCB, 694 F.2d at 1176, it is not necessary to engage in a preemption analysis here. 33 IV.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Stockton East Water District v. United States (2×)
Fed. Cl. · 2007 · confidence medium
Control Bd., 694 F.2d 1171, 1177 (9th Cir.1982) (quoting United States v. California, 509 F.Supp. 867, 886 (E.D.Cal.1981)).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Stockton East Water District v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2006 · confidence medium
Control Bd., 694 F.2d 1171, 1177 (9th Cir.1982) (quoting United States v. Cal., 509 F.Supp. 867 , 886 (E.D.Cal.1981)).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Natural Resources Defense Council v. Patterson
E.D. Cal. · 2004 · confidence medium
United States v. California, 694 F.2d 1171, 1176-77 (9th Cir.1982); see NRDC v. Houston, 146 F.3d 1118, 1132 (9th Cir.1998).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Westlands Water District v. United States
E.D. Cal. · 2001 · confidence medium
Council, 146 F.3d at 1132 (citing United States v. California, 694 F.2d 1171, 1176-77 (9th Cir.1982)).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Natural Resources Defense Council Trout Unlimited of California Bay Institute of San Francisco California Natural Resources Federation California Sportfishing Protection Alliance California Trout Friends of the River Northern California Guides Association Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations San Joaquin Raptor Rescue Center Sierra Club Stanislaus Audubon Society, Inc. United Anglers of California California Striped Bass Association National Audubon Society v. David G. Houston, and Lower Tule River Irrigation District Porterville Irrigation District Saucelito Irrigation District Stone Corral Irrigation District Teapot Dome Water District, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants. Natural Resources Defense Council Trout Unlimited of California Bay Institute of San Francisco California Natural Resources Federation California Sportfishing Protection Alliance California Trout Friends of the River Northern California Guides Association Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations San Joaquin Raptor Rescue Center Sierra Club Stanislaus Audubon Society, Inc. United Anglers of California California Striped Bass Association National Audubon Society v. David G. Houston, and Orange Cove Irrigation District Delano-Earlimart Irrigation District Exeter Irrigation District Ivanhoe Irrigation District Lindmore Irrigation District Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation District Terra Bella Irrigation District, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants. Natural Resources Defense Council Trout Unlimited of California Bay Institute of San Francisco California Natural Resources Federation California Sportfishing Protection Alliance California Trout Friends of the River Northern California Guides Association Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations San Joaquin Raptor Rescue Center Sierra Club Stanislaus Audubon Society, Inc. United Anglers of California California Striped Bass Association National Audubon Society v. David G. Houston, and Friant Water Users Authority, Natural Resources Defense Council Trout Unlimited of California Bay Institute of San Francisco California Natural Resources Federation California Sportfishing Protection Alliance California Trout Friends of the River Northern California Guides Association Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations San Joaquin Raptor Rescue Center Sierra Club Stanislaus Audubon Society, Inc. United Anglers of California California Striped Bass Association National Audubon Society v. David G. Houston, and Madera Irrigation District Chowchilla Water District, Defendants-Intervenors- Natural Resources Defense Council Trout Unlimited of California Bay Institute of San Francisco California Natural Resources Federation California Sportfishing Protection Alliance California Trout Friends of the River Northern California Guides Association Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations San Joaquin Raptor Rescue Center Sierra Club Stanislaus Audubon Society, Inc. United Anglers of California California Striped Bass Association National Audubon Society v. David G. Houston, and Arvin-Edison Water Storage District Shafter-Wasco Irrigation District Southern San Joaquin Municipal Utility District, Defendants-Intervenors- Natural Resources Defense Council Trout Unlimited of California Bay Institute of San Francisco California Natural Resources Federation California Sportfishing Protection Alliance California Trout Friends of the River Northern California Guides Association Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations San Joaquin Raptor Rescue Center Sierra Club Stanislaus Audubon Society, Inc. United Anglers of California California Striped Bass Association National Audubon Society v. David G. Houston, and Tulare Irrigation District, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant. Natural Resources Defense Council Trout Unlimited of California Bay Institute of San Francisco California Natural Resources Federation California Sportfishing Protection Alliance California Trout Friends of the River Northern California Guides Association Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations San Joaquin Raptor Rescue Center Sierra Club Stanislaus Audubon Society, Inc. United Anglers of California California Striped Bass Association National Audubon Society v. Roger Patterson, as Regional Director of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Bruce Babbitt Friant Water Users Authority, and Lower Tule River Irrigation District Porterville Irrigation District Saucelito Irrigation District Stone Corral Irrigation District Teapot Dome Water District, Defendants-Intervenors
9th Cir. · 1998 · confidence medium
United States v. California, 694 F.2d 1171, 1176-77 (9th Cir.1982). 63 The CVPIA provides that Friant dam water is not to be released from the Friant dam to comply with the provisions of the CVPIA regarding the development of a plan to reestablish fish below the dam.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Natural Resources Defense Council v. Houston
9th Cir. · 1998 · confidence medium
United States v. California, 694 F.2d 1171, 1176-77 (9th Cir.1982).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. State Water Resources Control Board
Cal. Ct. App. · 1986 · confidence medium
However, nothing we have said here should be read to compel the Board to impose identical terms and conditions upon the projects. 28 “Section 8 provides: “Nothing in this Act shall be construed as affecting or intended to affect or to in any way interfere with the laws of any State or Territory relating to the control, appropriation, use, or distribution of water used in irrigation, or any vested right acquired thereunder, and the Secretary of the Interior, in carrying out the provisions of this Act, shall proceed in conformity with such laws, and nothing herein shall in any way affect any…
cited Cited "see" South Delta Water Agency v. United States
9th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. California, 694 F.2d 1171, 1177 (9th Cir.1982).
cited Cited "see" South Delta Water Agency v. United States
9th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. California, 694 F.2d 1171, 1177 (9th Cir.1982).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Del Puerto Water District v. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation
E.D. Cal. · 2003 · signal: see also · confidence medium
Doc. 38 at 17:2-6,19-22. 43 U.S.C. § 383 ; see Natural Resources Defense Council v. Houston, 146 F.3d 1118, 1132 (9th Cir.1998) (citing California v. United States, 438 U.S. 645, 650 , 98 S.Ct. 2985 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1018 (1978) “ ‘cooperative federalism’ of § 8 require[s] the United States to comply with state water laws unless such a law was directly inconsistent with clear congressional directives regarding the project.” (Emphasis added)); see also U.S. v. State of Cal., State Water Resources Control Bd., 694 F.2d 1171, 1176 (9th Cir.1982).
cited Cited "see, e.g." New York Airlines, Inc. v. Dukes County
D. Mass. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. State of California, State Water Resources Board, 694 F.2d 1171 (9th Cir.1982) (conditions imposed by state board on federal project not prempted by supremacy clause).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Horacio Ramos MIRANDA, Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent
79-7370.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Dec 17, 1982.
694 F.2d 1171
Jack T. Price, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner., Dzintra I. Janavs, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent.
Pregerson, Nelson, Wilkins.
Published

In light of the opinion of the Supreme Court of November 8, 1982, -U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 281, 74 L.Ed.2d 12, granting the petition for certiorari and reversing this court’s opinion, this court’s opinion of April 8, 1982, 9th Cir., 673 F.2d 1105 is hereby vacated and the cause is remanded to the Board of Immigration Appeals for further proceedings not inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

Remanded.