green
Positive treatment
5.3 score
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
City of Kansas City, Missouri v. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, (Two Cases)
Corp., 742 F.2d 1472, 1480 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 1395 , 84 L.Ed.2d 784 (1985).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Massachusetts Law Reform Institute, Inc. v. Legal Services Corp.
These measures were broadly intended to preserve the funding status quo for LSC grantees, and to insure that “legal service programs not experience sudden funding losses.” East Arkansas Legal Services, Inc. v. Legal Services Corp. (“East Arkansas”), 742 F.2d 1472, 1480 (D.C.Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Salt Lake Community Action Program, Inc. v. Donna Shalala, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
(2×)
See East Arkansas, 742 F.2d at 1477 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Salt Lake Community Action Program, Inc. v. Sullivan
(2×)
See East Arkansas Legal Services v. Legal Services Corp., 742 F.2d 1472, 1477-78 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 1395 , 84 L.Ed.2d 784 (1985). 2 Here, HHS has not complied with the statute or HHS’s own regulations.
cited
Cited "see"
National Clearinghouse for Legal Services, Inc. v. Legal Services Corp.
See East Arkansas Legal Services v. Legal Services Corporation, 742 F.2d 1472 (D.C.Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 1395 , 84 L.Ed.2d 784 (1985). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Highland Petroleum, Inc. v. United States Department of Energy
See Community Nutrition Institute v. Block, 698 F.2d 1239, 1247 (D.C.Cir.1983) (“[i]n determining whether a plaintiff has [standing] ..., the focus is on the plaintiff’s allegations, not on the availability of alternative remedies”) (emphasis in original), rev’d on other grounds, 467 U.S. 340 , 104 S.Ct. 2450 , 81 L.Ed.2d 270 (1984), vacated on other grounds, 742 F.2d 1472 (D.C.Cir.1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
COMMUNITY NUTRITION INSTITUTE, Et Al., Appellants
v.
John R. BLOCK, Secretary United States Department of Agriculture, Et Al.
v.
John R. BLOCK, Secretary United States Department of Agriculture, Et Al.
81-2191.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Aug 8, 1984.
Tamm, Wilkey, Scalia.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
ORDER
PER CURIAM.Upon consideration of the mandate of the Supreme Court, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 2450, 81 L.Ed.2d 270, received on July 10, 1984, it is
ORDERED by the Court that this Court’s mandate issued on June 2, 1983 be, and the same hereby is, recalled and it is
FURTHER ORDERED by the Court that this Court’s opinion and judgment of January 21, 1983, 698 F.2d 1239, are vacated to the extent they held that individual consumers had standing to seek judicial review and it is
FURTHER ORDERED by the Court that the judgment of the District Court on appeal herein is in all respects affirmed.
The Clerk shall forthwith issue a certified copy of this order to the District Court in lieu of formal mandate.