green
Positive treatment
29.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 29 distinct citers.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Illoominate Media, Inc. v. Cair Florida, Inc.
McMahan, 311 F.3d at 1083 (citing Turner v. Orr, 759 F.2d 817, 821 (11th Cir. 1985)).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
MAK, LLC v. VUOZZO
See Roberts, 175 F.3d at 897 (“[A] judicial proceeding within the meaning of section 3 See also Gulf Refining Co. of La. v. United States, 269 U.S. 125, 136 (1925) (rendering judgment for precise sums set forth in stipulations was a ministerial duty); Turner v. Orr, 759 F.2d 817, 820 (11th Cir. 1985) (calculating back pay and seniority of employee was purely ministerial), cert. denied, 478 U.S. 1020 (1986); Jove Eng’g, Inc. v. I.R.S., 92 F.3d 1539, 1548 (11th Cir. 1996) (entering $500 offset against the IRS pursuant to a final order constituted a ministerial act); Roberts, 175 F.3d at 897 …
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
David Peery v. City of Miami
See Waters, 237 F.3d at 1277; Turner v. Orr, 759 F.2d 817, 821 (11th Cir.1985).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Federal Trade Commission v. Garden of Life, Inc.
“Construction of a consent judgment is ... a question of law subject to de novo review.” Turner v. Orr, 759 F.2d 817, 821 (11th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
D. Bruce McMahan v. William A. Toto
That means, according to MBM and McMahan, “the validity of appellants’ claim had been confirmed by the trial court, Toto was facing millions of dollars of potential liability and appellants had incurred thousands of dollars in legal fees incurred during three years of litigation” so “the $100 Offer could not be bona fide.” We review only for clear error the district court’s finding that Toto acted in good faith, Turner v. Orr, 759 F.2d 817, 821 (11th Cir. 1985), and “[t]he burden is upon the offeree to prove that the offeror acted without good faith,” Levine, 791 So. 2d at 1178…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Laitram Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Nec Corporation and Nec Technologies Inc.
See, e.g., Kenny v. Quigg, 820 F.2d 665, 670 (4th Cir.1987) (consent order); Turner v. Orr, 759 F.2d 817, 821 (11th Cir.1985) (consent judgment); United States v. National Steel Corp., 767 F.2d 1176, 1183 (6th Cir.1985) (consent decree).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Thomas v. Christopher
Turner v. Orr, 759 F.2d 817, 825 (11th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Principal Mutual Life Insurance v. Straus
See, e.g., Production & Maintenance Employees’ Local 504 v. Roadmaster Corp., 954 F.2d 1397, 1401-02 (7th Cir.1992); Turner v. Orr, 759 F.2d 817, 820 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 478 U.S. 1020 , 106 S.Ct. 3332 , 92 L.Ed.2d 738 (1986).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
62 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1505, 62 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 42,586 Jennie M. Griffin, Constance M. Anderson v. Michigan Department of Corrections
Turner v. Orr, 759 F.2d 817, 820 (11th Cir.1985) (ap-pealable where a special master had “ordered the immediate promotion of Little and [required calculation of] seniority, back pay and other appropriate relief’); Hattersley v. Bollt, 512 F.2d 209, 213 (3d Cir.1975) (judgment appealable even though “does not ... assess the precise monetary amount owed_ because the judgment fixes ... ultimate liability and clearly establishes the parameters of that liability”); Massachusetts Casualty Ins.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Miscott Construction Corp. v. Zaremba Walden Co.
Gulf Refining Co. v. United States, 269 U.S. 125, 136 , 46 S.Ct. 52, 53 , 70 L.Ed. 195 (1925) (rendering judgment for the exact sums set forth in stipulations was ministerial duty); Turner v. Orr, 759 F.2d 817, 820 (11th Cir.1985) (calculation of back pay and seniority of Air Force civilian employee was purely ministerial), ce rt. denied, 478 U.S. 1020 , 106 S.Ct. 3332 , 92 L.Ed.2d 738 (1986); Matter of Fox, 762 F.2d 54, 55 (7th Cir.1985) (“[a]n order upholding liability but leaving damages for subsequent determination is not a final order”).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
In Re Miscott Corporation
Gulf Refining Co. v. United States, 269 U.S. 125, 136 , 46 S.Ct. 52, 53 , 70 L.Ed. 195 (1925) (rendering judgment for the exact sums set forth in stipulations was ministerial duty); Turner v. Orr, 759 F.2d 817, 820 (11th Cir.1985) (calculation of back pay and seniority of Air Force civilian employee was purely ministerial), cert. denied, 478 U.S. 1020 , 106 S.Ct. 3332 , 92 L.Ed.2d 738 (1986); Matter of Fox, 762 F.2d 54, 55 (7th Cir.1985) ("[a]n order upholding liability but leaving damages for subsequent determination is not a final order"). 10 In this instance, enough remains for the bankrupt…
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Louis Schwartz v. Florida Board of Regents
Turner v. Orr, 759 F.2d 817, 821 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 3332 , 92 L.Ed.2d 738 (1986).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Local Number 93, International Ass'n of Firefighters v. City of Cleveland
(2×)
Co. v. Ketchum, supra, at 295-297 ; Swift & Co. v. United States, 276 U. S. 311, 327-331 (1928) (Swift I) (Brandeis, J.); EEOC v. Safeway *526 Stores, Inc., supra, at 799-800; Citizens for a Better Environment v. Gorsuch, supra, at 89-91 , 718 F. 2d, at 1127-1130 ; Sansom Committee v. Lynn, 735 F. 2d 1535 , 1538-1539 (CA3), cert. denied, 469 U. S. 1017 (1984); Turner v. Orr, 759 F. 2d 817, 825-826 (CA8 1985).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Local 28 of the Sheet Metal Workers' International Ass'n v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
(2×)
See Pennsylvania v. International Union of Operating Engineers, 770 F. 2d 1068 (CA3 1985), cert. denied, 474 U. S. 1060 (1986); Paradise v. Prescott, 767 F. 2d, at 1527-1530 ; Turner v. Orr, 759 F. 2d 817, 823-826 (CA11 1985); Vanguards of Clereland v. Cleveland, 753 F. 2d, at 485-489 ; Diaz v. American Telephone & Telegraph, 752 F. 2d 1356, 1360, n. 5 (CA9 1985); Van Aken v. Young, 750 F. 2d 43, 44-45 (CA6 1984); Wygant v. Jackson Bd. of Ed., 746 F. 2d 1152, 1157-1159 (CA6 1984), rev'd on other grounds, 476 U. S. 267 (1986); Kromnick v. School Dist. of Philadelphia, 739 F. 2d 894, 911 (CA3 19…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Wilmington Firefighters Local 1590 v. City of Wilmington
Cases 673, 675 (3rd Cir.1985), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 803 , 88 L.Ed.2d 779 (1986); Kromnick v. School Dist. of Philadelphia, 739 F.2d 894, 911 (3rd Cir.1984), cert. denied, -U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 782 , 83 L.Ed.2d 777 (1985); Turner v. Orr, 759 F.2d 817, 824 (11th Cir.1985); E.E.O.C. v. Local 638 ...
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Howard v. McLucas
Turner v. Orr, 759 F.2d 817, 823-26 (11th Cir.1985) (the legal basis of Stotts “does not limit the remedies to which parties may voluntarily agree under a consent judgment”).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
ca11 1986
Turner v. Orr, 759 F.2d 817, 823-26 (11th Cir.1985) (the legal basis of Stotts "does not limit the remedies to which parties may voluntarily agree under a consent judgment").
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Elmer Britton v. South Bend Community School Corporation
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Stotts , 467 U.S. at -, 104 S.Ct. at 2590 ; Turner v. Orr, 759 F.2d 817, 824-25 (11th Cir.1985); Vanguards of Cleveland v. City of Cleveland, 753 F.2d 479, 486 (6th Cir.1985); Wygant v. Jackson Board of Education, 746 F.2d at 1158 .
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
ca11 1985
(6×)
also: Cited "see"
In this regard, the "scope of a consent decree must be discerned within its four corners, and not by reference to what might satisfy the purposes of one of the parties to it." United States v. Armour & Co., 402 U.S. 673, 682 , 91 S.Ct. 1752, 1757 , 29 L.Ed.2d 256 (1971); Stotts, 104 S.Ct. at 2586 ; Turner v. Orr, 759 F.2d 817, 821 (11th Cir.1985); Roberts, 653 F.2d at 171 .
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Paradise v. Prescott
(6×)
also: Cited "see"
In this regard, the “scope of a consent decree must be discerned within its four corners, and not by reference to what might satisfy the purposes of one of the parties to it.” United States v. Armour & Co., 402 U.S. 673, 682 , 91 S.Ct. 1752, 1757 , 29 L.Ed.2d 256 (1971); Stotts, 104 S.Ct. at 2586 ; Turner v. Orr, 759 F.2d 817, 821 (11th Cir.1985); Roberts, 653 F.2d at 171 .
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. State of NJ
See Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Local Union 542, International Union of Operating Engineers, 770 F.2d 1068 , slip op. at 8-9, 12 (3d Cir.1985); Deveraux v. Geary, 765 F.2d 268 (1st Cir.1985); Turner v. Orr, 759 F.2d 817, 824 (11th Cir.1985); E.E.O.C. v. Local 638 ...
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. New Jersey
See Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Local Union 542, International Union of Operating Engineers, 770 F.2d 1068 , slip op. at 8-9, 12 (3d Cir.1985); Deveraux v. Geary, 765 F.2d 268 (1st Cir.1985); Turner v. Orr, 759 F.2d 817, 824 (11th Cir.1985); E.E.O.C. v. Local 638 ...
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Robert T. Deveraux v. William J. Geary, and Plaintiff-Class in Culbreath v. Dukakis, Intervenors-Appellees
Turner v. Orr, 759 F.2d 817, 823-826 (11th Cir.1985) (distinguishing Stotts because this case did not involve infringement of a bona fide seniority system; no third party rights are involved here as no non-minority worker had to step down to accommodate a minority; and this case involves a consent judgment entered into by the parties).
cited
Cited "see"
PIRTEK USA, LLC v. Lager
See Schwartz, 807 F.2d at 905 (citing to Turner v. Orr, 759 F.2d 817, 821 (11th Cir. 1985)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jacksonville Branch, Naacp v. The Duval County School Board, a Body Corporate
See Turner v. Orr, 759 F.2d 817, 821 (11th Cir.1985) (“Turner I”), cert. denied, 478 U.S. 1020 , 106 S.Ct. 3332 , 92 L.Ed.2d 738 (1986), cf. Anderson v. City of Bessemer City, 470 U.S. 564, 573-76 , 105 S.Ct. 1504, 1511-12 , 84 L.Ed.2d 518 (1985) (holding that clearly erroneous standard applies even when the district court’s findings are based solely on documentary evidence).
cited
Cited "see"
Gilmere v. City of Atlanta
See Turner v. Orr, 759 F.2d 817, 820 (11th Cir.1985); Gulf Tampa Drydock Co. v. Great Atlantic Insurance Co., 757 F.2d 1172, 1174 (11th Cir.1985). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Gilmere v. City Of Atlanta
See Turner v. Orr, 759 F.2d 817, 820 (11th Cir.1985); Gulf Tampa Drydock Co. v. Great Atlantic Insurance Co., 757 F.2d 1172, 1174 (11th Cir.1985) 17 The majority argues that the shooting was unreasonable regardless of whether it was done in self-defense because the officer's own conduct, his earlier treatment of Patillo, provoked Patillo's response.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. Harvey
See e.g., Turner v. Orr, 759 F.2d 817 (11th Cir.1985); United States v. City of Alexandria, supra; Morrow v. Crisler, 491 F.2d 1053 (5th Cir. en banc), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 895 , 95 S.Ct. 173 , 42 L.Ed.2d 139 (1974).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
National Ass'n for Advancement of Colored People v. Meese
See, e.g., Turner v. Orr, 759 F.2d 817 (11th Cir.1985); EEOC v. Local 638, 753 F.2d 1172 (2d Cir.1985); Vanguards v. City of Cleveland, 753 F.2d 479 (6th Cir.1985). 4 .
Roy L. PATTERSON, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Sam AUSTIN, Respondent-Appellee
v.
Sam AUSTIN, Respondent-Appellee
82-8092.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Apr 11, 1985.
Roney, Clark, Gibson.
Published
The court’s consideration of the respondent’s petition for rehearing en banc was postponed until a decision by the en banc court in Davis v. Kemp, 752 F.2d 1515 (11th Cir. En Banc 1985). In light of that decision and the opinion accompanying it, the petition for rehearing is DENIED and since no member of this panel nor other Judge in regular active service on the court requested that the court be polled on rehearing en banc (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Eleventh Circuit Rule 26), the Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.