green
Positive treatment
44.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Called into doubt
Raynaud Castillo-Bendana v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service
(3×)
also: Cited "see"
See Turcios v. INS, 821 F.2d 1396, 1402 (9th Cir.1987) (persecution found where applicant was confined, tortured, watched continuously, and felt compelled to restrict activities although not arrested and permitted to leave country); Saballo-Cortez, 761 F.2d at 1264 (fact that applicant was never detained and permitted to leave country cast doubt on claim of well-founded fear of persecution). 29 The beating suffered by Castillo-Bendana's sister was an act of violence, and we are willing to assume for the purposes of this disposition that the vandalism of her home could also be so considered.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Ahmed v. Atty Gen USA
See, e.g., Sharif v. INS, 87 F.3d 932, 935 (7th Cir. 1996) (finding that economic hardship did not amount to persecution where alien lost one job but found another); Saballo-Cortez v. INS, 761 F.2d 1259, 1264 (9th Cir. 1985) (holding that denial of food discounts and work permit for more desirable type of employment was not persecution).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Omar F. Ahmed v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States of America
See, e.g., Sharif v. INS, 87 F.3d 932, 935 (7th Cir.1996) (finding that economic hardship did not amount to persecution where alien lost one job but found another); Saballo-Cortez v. INS, 761 F.2d 1259, 1264 (9th Cir.1984) (holding that denial of food discounts and work permit for more desirable type of employment was not persecution).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Ahmed v. Atty Gen USA
See, e.g., Sharif v. INS, 87 F.3d 932, 935 (7th Cir. 1996) (finding that economic hardship did not amount to persecution where alien lost one job but found another); Saballo-Cortez v. INS, 761 F.2d 1259, 1264 (9th Cir. 1985) (holding that denial of food discounts and work permit for more desirable type of employment was not persecution).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Gill v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
See Singh-Kaur v. INS, 183 F.3d 1147, 1152 (9th Cir.1999); Berroteran-Melendez v. INS, 955 F.2d 1251, 1256 (9th Cir.1992); Saballo-Cortez v. INS, 761 F.2d 1259, 1263-64 (9th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Nigist Shoafera v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
However, it is well established that “deference must be given ‘to the immigration judge’s express and implied determination concerning credibility where the record supports this finding.’ ” Diaz-Escobar, 782 F.2d at 1492 , quoting Saballo-Cortez v. INS, 761 F.2d 1259, 1266 (9th Cir.1984).
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Gilberto Sebastian-Sebastian v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
(10×)
also: Cited "see"
Saballo-Cortez v. I.N.S., 761 F.2d 1259, 1262 (9th Cir.1985).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Morales-Canales v. INS
See Figeroa, 886 F.2d at 78 (citing Turcios v. INS, 821 F.2d 1396, 1399 (9th Cir. 1987); Saballo-Cortez v. INS, 761 F.2d 1259, 1262 (9th Cir. 1985)).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
George S. Girgis Samia Fargalla Diana Girgis Sarah Girgis v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
This discrimination does not rise to the level of "persecution." See Saballo-Cortez v. INS, 761 F.2d 1259, 1264 (9th Cir.1985).
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Mejia-Paiz v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
(4×)
also: Cited "see"
As a consequence, the petitioner bears the burden of persuading the IJ that his evidence is credible, Saballo-Cortez v. INS, 761 F.2d 1259, 1262 (9th Cir.1985), and the IJ is entitled to evaluate assertions of past persecution in light of the strength or weakness of such other evidence as the petitioner may present. 1 Petitioner contends, to the contrary, that the absence of evidence contradicting his assertions should lead to a grant of asylum, noting that “the government did not show any lack of credibility.” In support of his argument, petitioner relies on this court’s decision in McM…
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
47 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 8, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2815, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 4956 Leonel Antonio Mejia-Paiz v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
(4×)
also: Cited "see"
As a consequence, the petitioner bears the burden of persuading the IJ that his evidence is credible, Saballo-Cortez v. INS, 761 F.2d 1259, 1262 (9th Cir.1985), and the IJ is entitled to evaluate assertions of past persecution in light of the strength or weakness of such other evidence as the petitioner may present. 1 9 Petitioner contends, to the contrary, that the absence of evidence contradicting his assertions should lead to a grant of asylum, noting that "the government did not show any lack of credibility." In support of his argument, petitioner relies on this court's decision in McMulle…
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Horacio Jose Centeno-Sanchez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
See Cuadras v. INS, 910 F.2d 567, 571 (9th Cir.1990); Saballo-Cortez v. INS, 761 F.2d 1259, 1265 (9th Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Marlon Hernaldo Dominguez-Castillo v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
See Prasad, 47 F.3d at 339 ; Saballo-Cortez v. INS, 761 F.2d 1259, 1264-65 (9th Cir.1985). 19 Finally, the BIA took note of the citation ordering Dominguez-Castillo to appear to answer to an accusation.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Ioan Butnar and Elisabeta Butnar v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Saballo-Cortez v. INS, 761 F.2d 1259, 1266 (9th Cir.1985).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Abraham Heriberto Gonzalez-Alvarado v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Saballo-Cortez v. I.N.S., 761 F.2d 1259, 1264 (9th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Josefa Ana Osorio-Delgado Orlando Jose Baltodano-Osorio v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
See id.; see also Prasad v. INS, 47 F.3d 336, 339 (9th Cir.1995) (holding that brief detention does not necessarily establish persecution); Cuadras v. INS, 910 F.2d 571, 567 (9th Cir.1990) (holding that asylum claim was undercut by family's continued safety); Saballo-Cortez v. INS, 761 F.2d 1259, 1264-65 (9th Cir.1985) (holding that petitioner's ability to obtain visa and leave the country without difficulty undercut claim of persecution). 6 In addition, because the standard for withholding of deportation is higher than the standard for a grant of asylum and because Osorio-Delgado has failed t…
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Ana Hortencia Salazar-Obando v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Saballo-Cortez v. INS, 761 F.2d 1259, 1264 (9th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Carlos Alberto Obando-Rocha v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Cf. Saballo-Cortez v. INS, 761 F.2d 1259, 1264 (9th Cir.1984) (concluding that "[t]he fact that [Saballo-Cortez] was denied [by the Sandinistas] such perquisites as discounts on food and a special work permit for some other type of employment does not establish persecution").
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Roberto J. Aguilar-Salazar v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Kaveh-Haghigy v. INS, 783 F.2d 1321, 1323 (9th Cir.1986) (per curiam); Saballo-Cortez v. INS, 761 F.2d 1259, 1264 (9th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Armando Fuentes-Sandoval v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
(2×)
Berroteran-Melendez v. INS, 955 F.2d 1251, 1256 (9th Cir.1992); Turcios v. INS, 821 F.2d 1396, 1399 (9th Cir.1987) (citing Saballo-Cortez v. INS, 761 F.2d 1259, 1262 (9th Cir.1985)).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Roger Balmaceda-Gutierrez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Berroteran-Melendez, 955 F.2d 1251, 1257 (9th Cir.1992); Saballo-Cortez v. INS, 761 F.2d 1259, 1264 (9th Cir.1984).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Domingo Abad Calero-Gaitan v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Saballo-Cortez v. INS, 761 F.2d 1259, 1264 (9th Cir.1985). 6 Nor does Calero-Gaitan's personal history with the Sandinistas support his claim of a well-founded fear of persecution.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Pablo Emilio Aguirre-Castillo Nora Isabel Aguirre Pablo Emilio Aguirre Yaveska Del Soccoro Aguirre Nora Isabel Aguirre-Morales v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Saballo-Cortez v. INS, 761 F.2d 1259, 1264 (9th Cir.1984) (citing Raass v. INS, 692 F.2d 596, 596 (9th Cir.1982), for the proposition that asylum relief depends on something more than generalized economic disadvantage at the destination). 4 Aguirre's claims regarding graffiti-vandalism do not raise his claims to the level necessary to warrant relief on the basis of past persecution alone.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Noha Filomena Molinares, Baez De Carlos Alfonso Molinares-Mairena Martha Noha Molinares-Baes v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Saballo-Cortez v. INS, 761 F.2d 1259, 1264 (9th Cir.1984) (citing Raass v. INS, 692 F.2d 596, 596 (9th Cir.1982), for the proposition that asylum relief depends on something more than generalized economic disadvantage at the destination); Ubau-Marenco v. INS, 67 F.3d 750 , 755 (9th Cir.1995) (seizure of family property did not constitute persecution where petitioner's family continued to operate profitable business). 4 Molinares' claims regarding graffiti-vandalism do not raise her claims to the level necessary to warrant relief on the basis of past persecution alone.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Gheorhge Balaesh Elena Balaesh Delia Daniela Balaesh George Victor Balaesh v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Cf. Rodriguez-Rivera v. INS, 848 F.2d 998, 1006 (9th Cir.1988); Saballo-Cortez v. INS, 761 F.2d 1259, 1264 (9th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Michael Nosakhare Omoregbee v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
(2×)
"We must defer to an immigration judge's express and implied findings that the alien's testimony is not credible if the record supports such findings." Saballo-Cortez v. INS, 761 F.2d 1259, 1266 (9th Cir.1985) (emphasis added).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Raj Kumar Sandhi v. Immigration and Naturalization Services
Saballo-Cortez v. INS, 761 F.2d 1259, 1262 (9th Cir. 1985); Berroteran-Melendez v. INS, 955 F.2d 1251, 1258 (9th Cir. 1992) ("Because the BIA expressly adopted the IJ's finding that Berroteran-Melendez's testimony lacked credibility, there is no basis for the claim of past persecution.") 18 Because substantial evidence supports the IJ's findings on credibility, we need not consider petitioner's other claims. 19 Affirmed. * Honorable A. Wallace Tashima, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation ** This disposition is not appropriate for publicat…
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Sasan Sheikhvand v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Saballo-Cortez v. INS, 761 F.2d 1259, 1266 (9th Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Argentina Del Socorro Raudez-Hurtada v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
(2×)
The BIA carefully applied our decision in Saballo-Cortez v. INS, 761 F.2d 1259, 1264 (9th Cir.1985), in reaching its conclusion that the economic discrimination Ms. Raudez-Hurtada suffered was not so severe as to amount to persecution.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Asadollah Daylami, Mariam Ashouri, Rousbeh Daylami, Ronak Daylami v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Cf. Saballo-Cortez v. INS, 761 F.2d 1259, 1264 (9th Cir.1985) (explaining that Saballo-Cortez's asylum claim was undercut by the fact that "[i]n spite of [his] stubborn defiance and repeated resistance to participation in his country's compulsory service requirements, he was permitted to work until the day he left without arrest or harm"). 9 Daylami maintains that after he and his family returned from a two month trip to the United States, he and his wife experienced increased hostility at work and increased government surveillance.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
In-Long Lee v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
However, based on inconsistencies in his testimony, the IJ found Lee was not a credible witness. 10 We review the IJ's credibility finding for substantial evidence, Vilorio-Lopez v. INS, 852 F.2d 1137 (9th Cir.1988) (citing Turcios v. INS, 821 F.2d 1396, 1399 (9th Cir.1987)); Saballo-Cortez v. INS, 761 F.2d 1259, 1262 (9th Cir.1984), and grant such credibility findings substantial deference.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Zbigniew Iwan v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service
Compare Desir, 840 F.2d at 727 (petitioner's ability to earn livelihood severely impaired by threats of violence, eventually resulting in petitioner moving to different county); with Saballo-Cortez v. INS, 761 F.2d 1259, 1264 (9th Cir.1985) (denial of discounts on food and special work permit not sufficient to establish persecution).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Dariusz Kaminski v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service
Compare Desir, 840 F.2d at 727 (petitioner's ability to earn livelihood severely impaired by threats of violence, eventually resulting in petitioner moving to different county); with Saballo-Cortez v. INS, 761 F.2d 1259, 1264 (9th Cir.1985) (denial of discounts on food and special work permit not sufficient to establish persecution).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Chand Kumari v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
(2×)
In Saballo-Cortez v. INS, 761 F.2d 1259, 1266 (9th Cir.1985) we held that "we must defer to an immigration judge's express and implied findings that the alien's testimony is not credible if the record supports such findings." Saballo-Cortez v. INS, 761 F.2d 1259, 1266 (9th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Nadarajah Thavarajah v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service
As such, the BIA's determination that Thavarajah was not credible is "substantially reasonable." De Valle, 901 F.2d at 792 ; see Berroteran-Melendez v. INS, 955 F.2d 1251, 1256 (9th Cir.1992) (upholding adverse credibility determination partly on basis of discrepancies between application for asylum and testimony); Saballo-Cortez v. INS, 761 F.2d 1259, 1263-64 (9th Cir.1985) (same). 10 Thavarajah argues that the IJ's finding that he was credible is entitled to great weight.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Passos-Paternina
See United States v. Drougas, 748 F.2d 8, 30-31 (1st Cir.1984); United States v. Gallagher, 620 F.2d 797, 801 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 878 , 101 S.Ct. 224 , 66 L.Ed.2d 100 (1980); United States v. Bryant, 563 F.2d 1227, 1230 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 972 , 98 S.Ct. 1616 , 56 L.Ed.2d 65 (1978); United States v. Johnson, 761 F.2d 1259, 1273 (8th Cir.1985).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Rafael Figeroa, A/K/A Rafael Najarro-Morales v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Turcios v. INS, 821 F.2d 1396, 1399 (9th Cir.1987); Saballo-Cortez v. INS, 761 F.2d 1259, 1262 (9th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Mercedes Vilorio-Lopez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
(2×)
Turcios, 821 F.2d at 1399 ; Saballo-Cortez v. INS, 761 F.2d 1259, 1262 (9th Cir.1984).
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Hugo Turcios v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
(3×)
also: Cited "see"
Saballo-Cortez v. INS, 761 F.2d 1259, 1262 (9th Cir.1985); see also Zavala-Bonilla v. INS, 730 F.2d 562, 566 (9th Cir.1984).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Carlos Ovidio Platero-Cortez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Saballo-Cortez v. INS, 761 F.2d 1259, 1262 (9th Cir.); Bolanos-Hernandez, 767 F.2d at 1282 n. 8.
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Santos Carlos Martinez-Sanchez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
(4×)
also: Cited "see"
Saballo-Cortez v. INS, 761 F.2d 1259, 1262 (9th Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Efrain Antonio Rebollo-Jovel v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
(2×)
Compare Vides-Vides v. INS, 783 F.2d 1463, 1468-69 (9th Cir.1986) (Vides-Vides); Quintanilla-Ticas v. INS, 783 F.2d 955, 957 (9th Cir.1986) (Quintanilla-Ticas); Chatila v. INS, 770 F.2d 786, 790 (9th Cir.1985) (Chatila); Saballo-Cortez v. INS, 761 F.2d 1259, 1262 (9th Cir.1984) (Saballo-Cortez), with Cardoza-Fonseca v. INS, 767 F.2d 1448, 1450 , 1453-54 & n. 6 (9th Cir.1985) (Cardoza-Fonseca), cert. granted, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 1181 , 89 L.Ed.2d 298 (1986).
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Reginaldo Diaz-Escobar v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
(3×)
also: Cited "see", Cited "see, e.g."
Although we give serious consideration to such testimony if unrefuted, credible, and indirectly corroborated, see Bolanos, 767 F.2d at 1283 & n. 11, deference must be given “to the immigration judge’s express and implied determination concerning credibility where the record supports this finding.” Saballo-Cortez v. INS, 761 F.2d 1259, 1266 (9th Cir.1984) (Saballo-Cortez) (emphasis added).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Salvador Del Valle v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Bolanos-Hernandez , 749 F.2d at *1412 1320 n. 8; Saballo-Cortez v. INS, 761 F.2d 1259, 1262 (9th Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Jose Garcia-Ramos v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
In all our recent cases, we have decided either that the evidence supports relief under both sections 243(h) and 208(a), see, e.g., Argueta, 759 F.2d at 1397-98 ; Bolanos-Hernan-dez, 767 F.2d at 1288 ; Zavala-Bonilla v. INS, 730 F.2d 562 , 563-64 nn. 1 & 2, 567 (9th Cir.1984), or that the evidence supports neither form of relief, see, e.g., Saballo-Cortez v. INS, 761 F.2d 1259, 1262 (9th Cir.1985); Espinoza-Martinez, 754 F.2d at 1540 ; Chavez v. INS, 723 F.2d 1431, 1433 (9th Cir.1984). 6 .
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Luz Marina Cardoza-Fonseca v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Francisca Rosa Arguello-Salguera v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
McMullen, 658 F.2d at 1318 (citing Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951), for the proposition that evidence in support of the Board’s conclusion may be considered less persuasive if examiner who observed witness drew conclusions different than Board’s); cf. Saballo-Cortez v. INS, 761 F.2d 1259, 1266 (9th Cir.1985) (we defer to immigration judge’s negative credibility findings if supported by the record).
cited
Cited "see"
Korneitchouk v. Gonzales
See Saballo-Cortez v. I.N.S., 761 F.2d 1259, 1264 (9th Cir.1985); Raass v. I.N.S., 692 F.2d 596 , 596 (9th Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Singh v. Ashcroft
See Saballa-Cortez v. INS, 761 F.2d 1259, 1264-65 (9th Cir.1985) (denying petition where adverse credibility finding was based on the reasonable inference that if petitioner were subject to official persecution because of his draft resistance, he would not have been given a passport); see also Ceballos-Castillo, 904 F.2d at 521.
discussed
Cited "see"
Hamoudi H. KHOURASSANY; Hashem H. Khourassany; Fetam Khourassany, Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent
See Saballo-Cortez. v. INS, 761 F.2d 1259, 1265 (9th Cir.1984); cf. Kovac v. INS, 407 F.2d 102, 107 (9th Cir.1969) (deliberate imposition of substantial economic disadvantage may indicate persecution).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
OZARK AIR LINES, INC., Appellant,
v.
the AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION, INTERNATIONAL, Appellee
v.
the AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION, INTERNATIONAL, Appellee
84-1055.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
May 21, 1985.
Donald J. Meyers, St. Louis, Mo., for appellant., Daniel Kozma, Washington, D.C., for ap-pellee.
Lay, Gibson, Hea-Ney, Bright, Ross, McMillian, Arnold, Fagg, Bowman.
Published
ORDER
On rehearing en banc, the judgment of the district court, 577 F.Supp. 487, upholding the arbitrator’s opinion, is affirmed by an equally divided vote. [1] Chief Judge Lay and Circuit Judges Floyd R. Gibson, Hea-ney, Bright, and Arnold vote to affirm. Circuit Judges Ross, McMillian, John R. Gibson, Fagg, and Bowman vote to reverse.
1
. The grant of the rehearing en banc serves to vacate the prior panel opinion published at 744 F.2d 1347 (1984).